...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Manufacturing >Examining the Impact of Helmet Orientation Visual Cues on the Passing Effectiveness of Quarterbacks in American Football
【24h】

Examining the Impact of Helmet Orientation Visual Cues on the Passing Effectiveness of Quarterbacks in American Football

机译:研究头盔定向视觉提示对美式足球四分卫传球效率的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Defensive secondary players have long been instructed to “read the quarterback's eyes” in order to anticipate where a pass will be thrown. Where identifying quarterback gaze point is not feasible, head orientation becomes the primary indicator of a quarterback's intended passing target. Helmet stripes and logos may therefore provide visual cues to defensive players that inadvertently aid defensive players in determining the intended passing target. This paper presents the first comprehensive analysis of passing statistics from college football to examine the associations among head orientation cues provided by helmet styles and quarterback performance metrics. Five years of passing data (2009-2013) were analyzed from all 120 teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS). For this assessment, helmets were grouped into two categories – No Stripe (referent) and Stripe. Multiple measures of passing performance were used to compare helmet categories including: completion percentage (CP), interceptions per year, interceptions per passing attempt (IPA), Total Quarterback Rating (QBR) and Pass Expected Points Added (EPA). Negative outcomes were determined based on 25th/75th percentiles for the overall group. Least mean squares were used to test for differences among non-parametric variables. Using the percentile cut points, the crude odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the association of helmet categories with each outcome. FBS Year 2013 data represented the most significant findings. The odds of having a high IPA among teams with a helmet stripe was 2.4 times (95% CI: 1.01, 5.90) the odds of having a high IPA among teams without a helmet stripe (p<0.05). Similarly, teams with a striped helmet had a higher IPI (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 0.91, 5.08; p=0.08). Results in other years did not reach statistical significance and findings were mostly null. The findings suggest a recent trend toward significance among interception-related metrics. Future work will identify factors under which the effects of helmet orientation visual cues may be more pronounced.
机译:长期以来,防守次级球员一直被要求“读四分卫的眼睛”,以便预测将传球的位置。在确定四分卫注视点不可行的地方,头部朝向成为四分卫预期通过目标的主要指标。因此,头盔条纹和徽标可能会为防守球员提供视觉提示,从而无意中帮助防守球员确定目标传球目标。本文对大学橄榄球传递的统计数据进行了首次全面分析,以检查头盔样式和四分卫性能指标所提供的头部定向提示之间的关联。对“足球碗”细分(FBS)中所有120支球队的过去五年(2009-2013年)数据进行了分析。为了进行此评估,将头盔分为两类-无条纹(参考)和条纹。通过了多项通过表现的度量来比较头盔类别,包括:完成百分比(CP),每年的拦截次数,每次通过尝试的拦截次数(IPA),四分卫总得分(QBR)和通过的预期通过分数(EPA)。阴性结果是根据整个组的第25/75个百分位数确定的。最小均方用于检验非参数变量之间的差异。使用百分位数切割点,计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的粗略优势比(OR),以确定头盔类别与每种结果的关联。 FBS 2013年数据是最重要的发现。戴有头盔条纹的团队中IPA高的几率是无头盔条纹的团队中IPA高的几率的2.4倍(95%CI:1.01,5.90)(p <0.05)。同样,戴着条纹头盔的团队的IPI更高(或:2.15,95%CI:0.91、5.08; p = 0.08)。其他年份的结果未达到统计显着性,发现几乎为空。这些发现表明,与拦截相关的指标之间具有显着重要性的最新趋势。未来的工作将确定头盔定向视觉提示的影响可能更加明显的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号