首页> 外文期刊>Patient Intelligence >Using patients’ experiences with enema design to improve quality of life in patients with IBD
【24h】

Using patients’ experiences with enema design to improve quality of life in patients with IBD

机译:利用患者的灌肠设计经验来改善IBD患者的生活质量

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To gain insight from people in The Netherlands with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on their experiences with enema use, and their views on the use of enemas and mode of enema delivery.Methods: A total of 112 patients from The Netherlands with physician-diagnosed Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other intestinal problems completed an online questionnaire of 24 questions. These included: sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, enema use, adherence, perceived advantages/disadvantages of enema use, ideal enema design, and patient views on medication, and on drugs and medical care in general. All respondents had personal experience with enema use and were members of the Patient Intelligence Panel. The Medication Adherence Report Scale and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire were also used to assess patient responses.Results: Respondents reported overall satisfaction with their last enema use (4.3 on a scale of one to seven), with the main reasons for dissatisfaction being difficulty of administration and pain. Perception of enema convenience was rated 3.3 on average; one-fifth of respondents gave the lowest rating of “very problematic.” Three distinct improvements for enema design were suggested. Respondents were generally neutral or positive in their beliefs on enema medication, but were more neutral to negative in their views of drugs and prescribing in general.Conclusion: Real-life data on the views of patients with inflammatory bowel disease towards enema use are limited. Patients in this study were aware of the importance of adherence with their enema, but mainly did not regard it as convenient or easy to administer, and reported discomfort with enema use. Enema design was deemed by respondents as worth improving, and suggested improvements aimed to improve comfort with enema delivery. Adherence scales may be a valuable means of assessing views on medication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
机译:目的:从荷兰肠炎性肠病(IBD)患者中获取灌肠经验,灌肠使用和灌肠方式的见解。方法:共有来自荷兰的112名医生-诊断为克罗恩病,溃疡性结肠炎或其他肠道问题,完成了包含24个问题的在线问卷。这些包括:社会人口统计学和临床​​特征,灌肠的使用,依从性,灌肠使用的优缺点,理想的灌肠设计以及患者对药物,药物以及一般医疗的看法。所有受访者都有使用灌肠的个人经验,并且都是患者情报小组的成员。还使用了《药物依从性报告量表》和《关于药物问卷的信念》来评估患者的反应。结果:受访者对他们最近一次使用的灌肠剂表示总体满意(4.3分,比例为1到7分),不满意的主要原因是给药困难和痛苦。灌肠便利性的平均评分为3.3;五分之一的受访者对“非常有问题”的评分最低。建议对灌肠设计进行三项明显的改进。受访者对灌肠药物的看法总体上是中性或正面的,但对药物和总体处方的看法则较中性或负面。结论:关于炎症性肠病患者对使用灌肠的看法的真实数据有限。这项研究的患者意识到坚持灌肠的重要性,但主要不认为方便或易用,并报告了使用灌肠的不适感。受访者认为灌肠设计值得改进,并提出了旨在提高灌肠舒适度的改进建议。坚持量表可能是评估炎症性肠病患者对药物治疗看法的宝贵手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号