...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >The Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) in the Treatment of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case-Control Study
【24h】

The Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy (PEID) in the Treatment of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case-Control Study

机译:经皮内镜下椎板间盘摘除术(PEID)治疗钙化腰椎间盘突出症的临床对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), which poses advantages for certain types of herniated disc, is gaining wider acceptance in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of the PEID technique in treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. SETTING: University hospital in China.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the PEID technique in treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation, and a comparison between calcified and noncalcified disc herniation was drawn to analyze the causes of herniated disc calcification. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in our department between March 2011 and May 2013 were collected. Thirty cases with calcified lumbar disc herniation were included in the study group, and 30 age-, gender-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched cases with noncalcified lumbar disc herniation served as controls. Perioperative data, preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) values, MacNab scores, and postoperative low-extremity dysesthesia among patients in the 2 groups were collected.RESULTS: The values of computed tomography (CT) in the calcified group were significantly higher than those in the noncalcified group (P < 0.01). The preoperative disease courses in the 2 groups were similar. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the duration of traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) administration (P < 0.01). VAS and ODI scores improved significantly after surgery, but there were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Three months after surgery, the rate of low-extremity dysesthesia in the calcified group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.03) but became similar at 6 months. By applying MacNab criteria the proportions of good and excellent were greater than 90% in both groups, and there was no difference between groups (P > 0.05).LIMITATIONS: The sample size was small in this retrospective study.CONCLUSION: The PEID technique is an effective method in the treatment of calcified lumber disc herniation, although the rate of postoperative dysesthesia is higher in this group during the early postoperative period. Long-term TCM administration may be related to the calcification of herniated lumbar discs.
机译:经皮内镜下椎板间盘切除术(PEID)为某些类型的椎间盘突出带来了优势,在临床实践中正获得越来越广泛的接受。我们回顾性分析了PEID技术治疗钙化腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。研究设计:回顾性病例对照研究。单位:中国大学附属医院。目的:评价PEID技术治疗钙化腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,并比较钙化和非钙化椎间盘突出症的原因,以分析椎间盘钙化的原因。方法:收集2011年3月至2013年5月在我科接受全内镜腰椎间盘摘除术的患者的数据。研究组包括30例腰椎间盘突出症钙化病例,其中30例年龄,性别和体重指数(BMI)匹配的非钙化腰椎间盘突出症病例为对照组。收集两组患者的围术期数据,术前和术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)值,MacNab评分以及术后下肢肢体运动障碍。结果:计算机断层扫描(CT)值钙化组的钙化明显高于非钙化组(P <0.01)。两组的术前疾病进程相似。但是,中药(TCM)的给药时间有统计学差异(P <0.01)。术后VAS和ODI评分明显改善,但两组之间无显着差异(P> 0.05)。术后三个月,钙化组的下肢感觉异常的发生率显着高于对照组(P = 0.03),但在六个月时相似。通过采用MacNab标准,两组的优良率均在90%以上,两组之间无显着差异(P> 0.05)。限制:这项回顾性研究的样本量很小。结论:PEID技术是钙化性腰椎间盘突出症的一种有效方法,尽管该组术后早期感觉异常的发生率较高。中药长期服用可能与腰椎间盘突出症钙化有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号