首页> 外文期刊>Operations Research Perspectives >Portfolio performance evaluation in Mean-CVaR framework: A comparison with non-parametric methods value at risk in Mean-VaR analysis
【24h】

Portfolio performance evaluation in Mean-CVaR framework: A comparison with non-parametric methods value at risk in Mean-VaR analysis

机译:均值-CVaR框架中的投资组合绩效评估:均值-VaR分析中与非参数方法风险值的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

As we know, there is a belief in the finance literature that Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) are new approaches to manage and control the risk. Regard to, value at risk is not a coherent risk measure and it is not sub-additive and convex, so, we have considered conditional value at risk as a risk measure by different confidence level in the Mean-CVaR and multi objective proportional change Mean-CVaR models and compared these models with our previous mean-VaR models. This paper focuses on the performance evaluation process and portfolios selection by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Conventional DEA models assume non-negative values for inputs and outputs, but many of data take the negative value. Therefore, we have used our models based on Range Directional Measure (RDM) that can take positive and negative values. Here value at risk is obtained by non-parametric methods such as historical simulation and Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, a numerical example in Iran's market is presented.
机译:众所周知,金融文献认为风险价值(VaR)和条件风险价值(CVaR)是管理和控制风险的新方法。关于风险价值不是一个连贯的风险度量,也不是亚加性和凸性的,因此,我们通过Mean-CVaR和多目标比例变化均值的不同置信度,将条件风险价值视为一种风险度量-CVaR模型,并将这些模型与我们以前的均值-VaR模型进行比较。本文着重于使用数据包络分析(DEA)进行绩效评估的过程和项目组合的选择。常规的DEA模型假定输入和输出为非负值,但是许多数据采用负值。因此,我们使用了基于范围方向测度(RDM)的模型,该模型可以采用正值和负值。这里的风险价值是通过非参数方法(例如历史模拟和蒙特卡洛模拟)获得的。最后,给出了伊朗市场的一个数值示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号