首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >The Rectification of (Political) Names: Addressing Habermas’s Colonization via “the Political” to Remake the World
【24h】

The Rectification of (Political) Names: Addressing Habermas’s Colonization via “the Political” to Remake the World

机译:政治名称的更正:通过“政治”解决哈贝马斯的殖民统治,重塑世界

获取原文
           

摘要

This exercise in applied philosophy argues that if the philosophical ideas of Jürgen Habermas are to be implemented in order to achieve a liberated, emancipated society free of domination, and address other problems he identifies in the contemporary world, there must be active involvement of both politicians and political theorists in the project, as well as some theoretical and practical changes in Habermas’s approach regarding the notion of “the political” in the realm of practical politics. This paper builds upon an earlier article titled “The Rectification of (Modern) Names” and develops the key Confucian idea of the rectification of names. Specifically, this paper attempts to extend to the political realm of an earlier argument that Habermas’s analysis that system forces are colonizing the lifeworld is the best angle to attempt to realign contemporary political terms with the realities they should represent. As system is part of lifeworld, displacing lifeworld norms by system norms threatens the very existence of the lifeworld. Moreover, Habermas’s thinking on philosophy, politics, and sociology could help rectify prevailing problems in Western constitutional democracies, especially if practical politics were carried out using Habermas’s ideas on communicative action and discourse ethics. This paper attempts to put into practical terms of some problems Habermas left in philosophical ones, and such practical terms represent a modest solution, addressing a plethora of “irrationalities” pervading the lifeworld in its colonization by instrumental reason. The paper argues that in the unfolding of Eric Hobsbawm’s “Dual Revolution,” the Industrial Revolution continues to outstrip the Political Revolution.
机译:应用哲学的这一实践认为,如果要实施哈尔马斯(JürgenHabermas)的哲学思想,以实现一个不受统治的解放,解放的社会,并解决他在当代世界中发现的其他问题,那么两位政治家都必须积极参与和该项目的政治理论家,以及哈贝马斯在实践政治领域中关于“政治”概念的方法的理论和实践上的变化。本文以较早的文章“(现代)名称的更正”为基础,并提出了儒家关于名称更正的关键思想。具体来说,本文试图将政治论域扩展到一个较早的论点,即哈贝马斯关于系统力量正在殖民生活世界的分析是试图使当代政治术语与其应代表的现实重新契合的最佳角度。由于系统是生活世界的一部分,因此用系统规范取代生活世界规范会威胁到生活世界的存在。此外,哈贝马斯关于哲学,政治和社会学的思想可能有助于纠正西方宪政民主制中普遍存在的问题,特别是如果运用哈贝马斯关于交往行动和话语伦理学的思想开展实际政治活动的话。本文试图将哈贝马斯在哲学上遗留下来的一些问题的实际用语,这些实际用语代表了一个适度的解决方案,解决了由于工具性原因而在生活世界殖民化中泛滥的“非理性”现象。该论文认为,在埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆(Eric Hobsbawm)的“双重革命”中,工业革命继续超越政治革命。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号