首页> 外文期刊>Oeno One >Evaluation of a commercial grape yield monitor for use mid-season and at-harvest
【24h】

Evaluation of a commercial grape yield monitor for use mid-season and at-harvest

机译:评估用于季节中期和收获时的商用葡萄产量监控器

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: Yield monitors are becoming more common in North America. This research evaluates the precision and accuracy of a retro-fitted, commercially available grape yield monitor mid-season, for crop estimation and crop thinning applications, and at harvest for yield mapping.Methods and Results: Several grape yield monitors were mounted on the discharge conveyor belt of grape harvesters in both commercial and research vineyards in North America. Sensor response was compared to manual measurements at multiple masses, ranging from 20 kg to 28 Mg over the course of three seasons. Measurements were taken during crop thinning and estimation (mid-season) and at harvest. Results showed that the grape yield monitor performance was sufficient to generate good spatial maps of the relative variation in harvest yield and mid-season thinned yield. However, at harvest the sensor showed a shift in response between days of up to ±15%, such that the generation of absolute yield maps required a daily calibration against a known mass. Within a day (single harvest operation) the sensor response did not appear to drift. Mid-season applications required a different calibration to harvest applications.Conclusion: The yield sensor worked well for both mid-season and at harvest operations in North American vineyards but required a daily calibration to avoid drift issues. The mid-season yield calibrations were different between seasons; however, the harvest calibration factor was stable between seasons.Significance and Impact of study: The study showed that a commercial yield monitor with correct calibration was effective at even low fruit flow. This opens the possibility of using a harvest sensor mid-season to mechanically estimate fruit load from small point samples and to map the amount of fruit removed ?during fruit thinning operations. This will improve the quality of information available to viticulturist to understand fruit and crop load. The commercial yield monitor is suitable for use in North American vineyards. IntroductionOn-harvester grape yield monitors have been commercially available since the late 1990s. The first commercially available grape yield monitor was the HM-570 grape yield monitor released by HarvestMaster (Logan, UT, USA). The HM-570 was a volumetric sensor that used ultra-sonic sensors mounted above the discharge conveyor to measure the height (volume) of grapes on the conveyor belt. Volume was then calibrated to mass using a density coefficient. Considerable issues with the operation of the system in Australian conditions between 1999 and 2002 were noted by researchers at CSIRO and The University of Sydney (Taylor, 2004). In particular, the density coefficient required constant adjustment, not only between varieties but also throughout the day as the ratio of berries to must being offloaded changed.In 2001, Farmscan Ltd (Western Australia, Australia) released a load cell-based grape yield sensor that proved to be more reliable than the HarvestMaster system (Taylor 2004); however problems with Farmscan’s parent company effectively resulted in the Farmscan grape yield sensor being withdrawn from the market by 2007. A second load cell-based system was commercially released in 2005 in Australia by Advanced Technology Viticulture (ATV) (Adelaide, South Australia, Australia)? Since 2005 there has been a slow but steady increase in adoption of the ATV grape yield monitor, predominantly in Australia but increasingly in North America with 6 yield monitor installations in the USA in 2012, 9 in 2013 and >30 in 2014.Examples of yield maps have been presented in the literature (Bramley & Hamilton, 2004; Tisseyre et al., 2007; Arnó et al., 2009), as well as a geostatistical analysis of the spatial variation observed in Australian and European viticulture (Taylor et al., 2005); however, there has been no independent evaluation of this technology published. Given the increased interest in grape yield monitors in the USA, and the expected continued growth in adoption, an evaluation of the accuracy and the potential uses of this technology is considered pertinent.Materials and MethodsSystem and Installation: The only currently available commercial grape yield monitor is manufactured, installed and supported by Advanced Technology Viticulture (ATV). The ATV grape yield monitor (GYM) is designed to be retrofitted to a discharge conveyor belt and can be altered to fit most makes of grape harvesters that use a discharge conveyor. The yield sensor consists of a weigh-frame on load cells under the discharge conveyor belt of the harvester that weighs the grapes as they are being off-loaded. A belt speed sensor, a junction box and a data logger/controller in the tractor cabin complete the system. For mapping capabilities a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver is also required. After each installation, a static calibration of the load cells is performed by placing known dead weights on the discharge conveyor belt ove
机译:目标:收益监控器在北美越来越普遍。这项研究评估了改装的,市售的葡萄产量监测器在季节中期的准确性和准确性,该产量监测器用于作物估计和农作物稀疏应用,以及在收获时用于产量图绘制。方法和结果:在出水口安装了多个葡萄产量监测器北美商业和研究葡萄园的葡萄收割机传送带。在三个季节的过程中,将传感器的响应与手动测量的多个质量(范围从20 kg至28 Mg)进行了比较。在作物间伐和估计(季节中期)和收获期进行测量。结果表明,葡萄产量监测器的性能足以产生良好的空间图,反映出收获产量和季节中期间苗产量的相对变化。但是,在收获时,传感器在几天之间显示出高达±15%的响应变化,因此,绝对产量图的生成需要针对已知质量进行每日校准。在一天之内(单次收获操作),传感器响应似乎没有漂移。中期应用需要与收获应用进行不同的校准。结论:产量传感器在北美葡萄园的中期和收获操作中均能很好地工作,但需要进行日常校准以避免漂移问题。不同季节之间的中期产量校准不同;研究的意义和影响:研究表明,具有正确校准的商业产量监测器即使在低果流量下也有效。这开辟了在季节中期使用收获传感器来机械估计小点样品的水果负荷并绘制水果疏果操作中去除的水果数量的可能性。这将提高葡萄种植者了解水果​​和农作物负荷的信息质量。商业产量监测仪适用于北美葡萄园。简介自1990年代末以来,收割机上的葡萄单产监测仪已在市场上销售。第一台商用葡萄产量监测仪是HarvestMaster(美国犹他州洛根市)发布的HM-570葡萄产量监测仪。 HM-570是一种体积传感器,它使用安装在卸料传送带上方的超声波传感器来测量传送带上葡萄的高度(体积)。然后使用密度系数将体积校准为质量。 CSIRO和悉尼大学的研究人员指出,在1999年至2002年之间,该系统在澳大利亚的运行中存在很多问题(Taylor,2004年)。尤其是,密度系数不仅需要在品种之间进行调整,而且还需要不断调整,因为浆果与必须卸载的比例发生了变化.2001年,Farmscan Ltd(澳大利亚西澳大利亚州)发布了基于称重传感器的葡萄产量传感器被证明比HarvestMaster系统更可靠(Taylor 2004);然而,Farmscan母公司的问题实际上导致了Farmscan葡萄产量传感器在2007年退出市场。2005年,先进技术葡萄栽培技术(ATV)在澳大利亚商业投放了第二个基于称重传感器的系统(阿德莱德,南澳大利亚,澳大利亚) )?自2005年以来,ATV葡萄产量监测仪的采用缓慢但稳定地增加,主要在澳大利亚,但在北美却越来越多,2012年美国安装了6台产量监测仪,2013年安装了9台,2014年安装了30台。文献(Bramley&Hamilton,2004; Tisseyre et al。,2007;Arnóet al。,2009)以及在澳大利亚和欧洲的葡萄栽培中观察到的空间变化的地统计学分析都已经提供了地图(Taylor et al。,2009)。 ,2005);但是,尚未对此技术进行独立评估。鉴于美国对葡萄产量监测仪的兴趣日益增加,以及采用这种葡萄的预期持续增长,因此认为对该技术的准确性和潜在用途进行评估是适当的。材料和方法系统和安装:目前唯一可用的商用葡萄产量监测仪由先进技术葡萄栽培(ATV)制造,安装和支持。 ATV葡萄产量监控器(GYM)可以改装到卸料传送带上,并且可以更改为适合大多数使用卸料传送带的葡萄收获机品牌。产量传感器由一个称重框架组成,该称重框架位于收割机的卸料传送带下方的称重传感器上,在葡萄卸载时称重。拖拉机驾驶室中的皮带速度传感器,接线盒和数据记录器/控制器完善了系统。为了获得地图功能,还需要全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)接收器。每次安装后,通过将已知的自重放在卸载传送带上进行称重传感器的静态校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号