首页> 外文期刊>National Journal of Community Medicine >An Analysis of Application of Multiple Comparison Tests (post-hoc) in ANOVA in Recently Published Medical Research Literature
【24h】

An Analysis of Application of Multiple Comparison Tests (post-hoc) in ANOVA in Recently Published Medical Research Literature

机译:最近发表的医学研究文献中方差分析中多重比较检验(事后)的应用分析

获取原文
           

摘要

"Background: The usage of statistical methods specially ANOVA and post hoc test are increase in medical research, however inaccurate application of ANOVA and post hoc test were observed commonly. So we reviewed application of ANOVA and post-hoc test in recent published biomedical research literature. Method: Original articles published in bio-medical journals subscribed by the central library of our institute (SMIMER, Surat) were reviewed for statistical applications mainly ANOVA and post hoc test. Result: Among the 1128 reviewed articles 800 (70.92%) used inferential statistical techniques. Among these 203 (25.37) articles were used ANOVA and out of that 92 (45.23%) were used post hoc test. Maximum usage of post hoc test was found in basic and paramedical research article, whereas least usage was found in the surgical articles. It has been also observed that out of the 92 original articles which applied post hoc test, in 28 (30.43%) the application was inappropriate. Conclusion: Conceptual understanding and application of ANOVA and Post hoc test was lacking among bio-medical researcher."
机译:“背景:医学研究中越来越多地使用统计方法,特别是ANOVA和事后检验,但普遍观察到ANOVA和事后检验的应用不正确。因此,我们在最近发表的生物医学研究文献中回顾了ANOVA和事后检验的应用方法:对我院中央图书馆(SMIMER,苏拉特)订阅的生物医学期刊上发表的原始文章进行统计分析,主要用于方差分析和事后检验;结果:在1128篇经审查的文章中,有800篇(占70.92%)用于推论统计技术:在203(25.37)篇文章中使用ANOVA,其中92篇(45.23%)进行事后检验,基础和辅助医学研究文章中事后检验的使用率最高,还观察到在进行事后检验的92篇原始文章中,有28篇(30.43%)是不合适的。生物医学研究人员缺乏对ANOVA和事后检验的认识和应用。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号