...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparison on Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis Between Esophagogastric Junctional Adenocarcinoma (Siewert II/III Types) and Distal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Cohort Study, a Single Institution, High Volume Experience in China
【24h】

Comparison on Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis Between Esophagogastric Junctional Adenocarcinoma (Siewert II/III Types) and Distal Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Retrospective Cohort Study, a Single Institution, High Volume Experience in China

机译:食管胃交界性腺癌(Siewert II / III型)与远端胃腺癌的临床病理特征和预后的比较:回顾性队列研究,单一机构,在中国具有丰富经验

获取原文
           

摘要

The incidence of the EGJA is rapidly increasing. The clinicopathological features have not yet been elucidated. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis between patients with esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (EGJA) and distal gastric adenocarcinoma (DGA). In this retrospective study, 1230 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2010 in West China Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on tumor location. Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis were also used to evaluate the prognostic factors of DGA and EGJA. Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were divided into 2 study groups according to tumor location: 321 EGJA (26.1%) and 909 DGA (73.9%). Tumors with larger diameter, more advanced pT and pN stage were more common in EGJA. Significant differences were revealed in 3-year overall survival rate (3-YS) between 2 groups: EGJA (57.5%) and DGA (65.5%) ( P = 0.001), and further analysis indicate that there was also significant difference on 3-YS between EGJA (76.9%) and DGA (84.2%) ( P = 0.012) in stage II. From our multivariate analysis, we found that there were different independent prognostic indicators for DGA and EGJA. The clinicopathological features of EGJA were strikingly different from DGA and patients with EGJA showed a worse prognosis when compared with DGA. The pT stage, pN stage, pM stage, tumor size, age, and radical degree were determined to be independent factors of prognosis for DGA, while only combined organ resection, pN stage, and pM stage were independent prognostic factors for EGJA.
机译:EGJA的发病率正在迅速增加。临床病理特征尚未阐明。这项研究的目的是分析食管胃结节性腺癌(EGJA)和远端胃腺癌(DGA)患者在临床病理特征和预后方面的差异。在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2006年1月至2010年12月在华西医院接受胃切除术的1230例患者。根据肿瘤位置将患者分为两组。比较临床病理特征,术后并发症和生存结果。单因素和多因素分析还用于评估DGA和EGJA的预后因素。胃腺癌患者根据肿瘤位置分为两个研究组:321 EGJA(26.1%)和909 DGA(73.9%)。在EGJA中,直径较大,pT和pN分期更晚期的肿瘤更为常见。两组之间的3年总生存率(3-YS)有显着差异:EGJA(57.5%)和DGA(65.5%)(P = 0.001),进一步分析表明3-组的3年总生存率(3-YS)也存在显着差异。第二阶段的EGJA(76.9%)和DGA(84.2%)之间的YS(P = 0.012)。从我们的多元分析中,我们发现DGA和EGJA有不同的独立预后指标。 EGJA的临床病理特征与DGA明显不同,与DGA相比,EGJA患者预后较差。 pT分期,pN分期,pM分期,肿瘤大小,年龄和根治程度是决定DGA预后的独立因素,而只有器官切除,pN分期和pM分期才是EGJA的独立预后因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号