首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A retrospective study
【24h】

A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A retrospective study

机译:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术与融合术结合颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎间盘置换术治疗跳过型宫颈变性椎间盘疾病的比较:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely performed for the treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). In recent decades, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and hybrid surgery (HS) have been developed to overcome the shortcomings of ACDF. Controversy still remains with regard to the optimal surgical procedure for skip-level CDDD. A total of 55 patients who received surgical treatment for skip-level CDDD in our department were reviewed. The patients were divided into the HS group (n = 29) and the CDA group (n = 26). The collected data included Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and cervical lordosis (CL), range of motion (ROM), and intervertebral disc height (IDH). Radiological changes at the intermediate segment (IS) were also collected. All data were collected preoperatively and at routine postoperative intervals of 1 week and 3, 6, and 12 months and at the last follow-up period. Compared with preoperative values, mean JOA, NDI, and VAS scores significantly improved after surgery in both the HS and CDA groups ( P .05). The HS group had better CL recovery than the CDA group after surgery ( P .05). A significant difference in the ROM of the IS was found at the last follow-up between the 2 groups ( P < .05). At the last-follow-up, 4 discs (14.29%) in the CDA group and 6 discs (19.36%) in the HS group had adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) without symptoms. Both HS and CDA might be considered safe and effective surgical strategies for the treatment of skip-level CDDD. Although the clinical outcomes were similar in the 2 groups, CDA altered the ROM of the IS to a lesser degree.
机译:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)已广泛用于治疗多级颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病(CDDD)。在最近的几十年中,已经开发了颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)和混合手术(HS)来克服ACDF的缺点。关于跳过级CDDD的最佳手术程序仍然存在争议。我科共对55例接受过跳跃级CDDD手术治疗的患者进行了回顾。将患者分为HS组(n = 29)和CDA组(n = 26)。收集的数据包括日本骨科协会(JOA),颈部残疾指数(NDI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,颈椎前凸(CL),运动范围(ROM)和椎间盘高度(IDH)。还收集了中间段(IS)的放射学变化。术前和术后1周,3、6和12个月的常规间隔以及最后的随访期收集所有数据。与术前相比,HS和CDA组的平均JOA,NDI和VAS评分在手术后均有显着改善(P .05)。术后HS组的CL恢复优于CDA组(P = 0.05)。在两组之间的最后一次随访中发现IS的ROM有显着差异(P <.05)。在最后的随访中,CDA组有4片(14.29%),HS组有6片(19.36%)有无症状的邻近节段变性(ASD)。 HS和CDA均可被视为治疗跳过级CDDD的安全有效的手术策略。尽管两组的临床结果相似,但CDA改变了IS的ROM程度较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号