首页> 外文期刊>Global environmental research >Objective and Subjective Measurements for Development and Well-being: Some Perspectives from a Bottom-up Study in Indonesia
【24h】

Objective and Subjective Measurements for Development and Well-being: Some Perspectives from a Bottom-up Study in Indonesia

机译:发展和福祉的客观和主观评估:印度尼西亚自下而上研究的一些观点

获取原文
           

摘要

The concept of development or, ultimately, well-being or happiness is now under extensive discussion by many scholars and international organizations. After all, what are we trying to measure and understand, and why? Another important question is whether or not we have a sufficient framework, tools, data and information to measure the state of people’s well-being and how it changes. The aim of this article is to conduct extensive reviews on the existing well-being concepts. The study discusses Indonesia’s well-being measurement framework as a case study. Through the discussion, the gaps between the ideal and the reality are identified. Based on these findings, directions are proposed to stakeholders on how they can implement the desirable improvements identified. Indonesia has collected national statistical data to facilitate analysis of its population’s well-being. This study provides suggestions for improving this collection system by proposing inclusive and participatory subjective measurement as an important supplemental approach to provide missing pieces of the puzzle in measuring changes in people’s well-being. Civil society often finds subjective measurements easier to understand and relate to. They are, in fact, the biggest stakeholder in development. If an inclusive framework for subjective measurement can be established, many potential or appropriate development practices may be realized. Important possibilities include international benchmarking and acceleration of development resonance driven by common people.
机译:现在,许多学者和国际组织正在广泛讨论发展或最终的幸福或幸福的概念。毕竟,我们试图衡量和理解什么,为什么?另一个重要的问题是,我们是否有足够的框架,工具,数据和信息来衡量人们的福祉状况及其变化。本文的目的是对现有的幸福概念进行广泛的审查。该研究以案例研究的形式讨论了印尼的福祉衡量框架。通过讨论,确定了理想与现实之间的差距。基于这些发现,向利益相关者提出了有关如何实施已确定的理想改进的指导。印度尼西亚收集了国家统计数据,以促进对其人口福祉的分析。这项研究提出了一种包容性和参与性主观测量方法,作为一种重要的补充方法,为衡量人们的福祉变化提供了难题的缺失,从而为改善这一收集系统提供了建议。民间社会经常发现主观测量更容易理解和联系。实际上,他们是发展中的最大利益相关者。如果可以建立包容性的主观衡量框架,那么可能会实现许多潜在的或适当的开发实践。重要的可能性包括国际基准测试和加速由普通民众推动的发展共鸣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号