首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Journal of Science Education >Comparative Effects of Individualised and Cooperative Learning Instructional Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Organic Chemistry
【24h】

Comparative Effects of Individualised and Cooperative Learning Instructional Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Organic Chemistry

机译:个性化和合作学习教学策略对高中生有机化学学习成绩的比较作用

获取原文
       

摘要

This study compared the effects of Individualised Instructional Strategy (IIS) and Cooperative Learning Instructional Strategy (CLIS) on male and female senior secondary school students’ academic achievement in Organic Chemistry. 2 research questions and 3 hypotheses guided the study. The design was quasi-experimental. The Population comprised 3,366 SSII chemistry students. A sample of 602 students from 6 schools (339 males and 263 females) was drawn from the population using balloting technique. The experimental groups were taught with IIS and CLIS while the control groups were taught with Lecture method, in each of the sampled schools. Both the experimental and control groups were taught organic chemistry by their regular chemistry teachers. The instruments used for the study were Chemistry Achievement Test on Organic Chemistry (CATOC), Cooperative Learning Instructional Manual and Learning Activity Package Manual which were validated by three experts. The reliability of the CATOC was determined using K-R 20 with index of .82. The research questions were answered using mean with standard deviation while the null hypotheses were tested using Analysis of Covariance. The findings revealed that both IIS and CLIS significantly enhanced students’ achievement in Organic Chemistry better than the Lecture method, but the CLIS was more effective than the IIS. The researcher recommended among others, that chemistry students should be exposed to student-centred and activity-based teaching strategies such as the Individualised Instructional Strategy and Cooperative Learning Instructional Strategy, for enhanced students’ academic achievement.
机译:这项研究比较了个性化教学策略(IIS)和合作学习教学策略(CLIS)对男女高中生有机化学学习成绩的影响。 2个研究问题和3个假设指导了研究。设计是准实验的。人口包括3,366名SSII化学专业的学生。使用抽签技术从6所学校的602名学生中抽样(男339名,女263名)。在每个样本学校中,实验组都使用IIS和CLIS进行教学,而对照组则采用“讲座”方法进行教学。实验组和对照组均由其常规化学老师教授有机化学。该研究使用的工具是有机化学化学成就测试(CATOC),合作学习指导手册和学习活动包手册,并由三位专家进行了验证。 CATOC的可靠性是使用K-R 20(指数为.82)确定的。使用具有标准偏差的均值回答研究问题,同时使用协方差分析检验原假设。调查结果表明,IIS和CLIS都比讲课法显着提高了学生在有机化学方面的成绩,但CLIS比IIS更有效。研究人员建议,化学专业的学生应接受以学生为中心和基于活动的教学策略,例如个性化教学策略和合作学习教学策略,以提高学生的学习成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号