...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Bioethics >European bioethics institutionalisation in theory and practice
【24h】

European bioethics institutionalisation in theory and practice

机译:欧洲生物伦理制度化的理论与实践

获取原文
           

摘要

The starting point of this paper is the role the institutions as social facts, have in modern (European) society, as well as the exploring of the meaning and purpose of the institutionalisation process. Institutionalisation is seen as the process understood as establishing different normative and organisational institutions. Our interest is also concentrated upon following the line of (European) bioethics. Since V. R. Potter used this term in 1970/71 for the fi rst time, bioethics has rapidly conquered various levels of the American society, becoming well known and even better present in a series of institutions. At the same time, almost contrary to the American example and experience, European continent has for a long time been resistant to the term of bioethics, as well as to the very idea of such discipline. Until recently, European orientation and devotion to the traditional terms (medical ethics, biomedical ethics, physician’s deontology, etc.) and the misconception of (American) bioethics, have been main reasons for the lack of or poor bioethical institutionalisation in European countries and the Union. Being discovered in 1997 and promoted since 2007, the work of Fritz Jahr has been spreading new lights onto the originality and authenticity of bioethical ideas in Europe, offering remarks regarding the Bioethical Imperative and institutions, as well as possibilities os European bioethical institutionalisation.
机译:本文的出发点是制度作为社会事实在现代(欧洲)社会中的作用,以及对制度化过程的意义和目的的探索。制度化被视为理解为建立不同的规范和组织机构的过程。我们的兴趣也集中在遵循(欧洲)生物伦理学的路线上。自从V. R. Potter于1970/71年首次使用该术语以来,生物伦理学迅速征服了美国社会的各个层面,在一系列机构中广为人知,甚至表现得更好。同时,几乎与美国的榜样和经验背道而驰,欧洲大陆长期以来一直对生物伦理​​学术语以及这种纪律观念持抵触态度。直到最近,欧洲对传统术语(医学伦理学,生物医学伦理学,医师的道义学等)的重视和奉献以及对(美国)生物伦理学的误解,一直是欧洲国家缺乏或缺乏生物伦理制度化的主要原因。联盟。 Fritz Jahr的工作于1997年被发现,并于2007年开始推广,其工作一直在为欧洲生物伦理学思想的原创性和真实性传播新的亮点,提供有关生物伦理学必要性和制度以及欧洲生物伦理学制度化可能性的评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号