...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Physical Sciences >The comparison of soil-pile interaction and fixed base support for integral prestressed concrete box-girder bridge
【24h】

The comparison of soil-pile interaction and fixed base support for integral prestressed concrete box-girder bridge

机译:整体预应力混凝土箱梁桥土桩相互作用与固定基础支护的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper is to investigate the effect of soil-pile interaction for integral prestressed concrete box-girder bridge under low intensity earthquake. The soil-pile interaction was compared to fixed base support to see its effect. In this case study, one integral prestressed concrete box-girder bridge in Selangor, Malaysia had been chosen, that is, Kampung Sawah Bridge. To produce the low seismic loading, the ground response analysis had been conducted to produce three synthetic acceleration time histories loading. For soil-pile interaction, the p-y curves were determined by using LPILE program. The seismic analyses conducted were vibration analysis and nonlinear time history analysis. Free vibration analysis presented the periods and mode shapes of the structure while nonlinear time history analyses presented the maximum displacement at the top of pier and middle of deck and pier and deck forces response. It can be concluded that the soil-pile interaction support gives the longer period compared to fixed base support which almost differ about more than five times higher for the first mode. The displacement soil-pile interaction is higher compared to fixed base support; the increasing of displacement is more at transverse direction event for deck and pier. The all forces response from soil-pile interaction support is higher compared to fixed base support, except the axial force response of pier.
机译:本文旨在研究土-桩相互作用对整体预应力混凝土箱梁桥在低烈度地震作用下的影响。将土桩相互作用与固定基础支撑进行比较,以了解其作用。在本案例研究中,选择了马来西亚雪兰莪州的一座整体式预应力混凝土箱梁桥,即甘榜萨瓦桥。为了产生低地震载荷,已经进行了地面响应分析以产生三个合成加速时间历史载荷。对于土-桩相互作用,使用LPILE程序确定p-y曲线。进行的地震分析是振动分析和非线性时程分析。自由振动分析显示了结构的周期和振型,而非线性时程分析则显示了桥墩顶部和桥墩中间的最大位移以及桥墩和桥墩的力响应。可以得出的结论是,与固定基础支撑相比,土-桩相互作用支撑具有更长的持续时间,而固定基础支撑几乎相差大约五倍以上。与固定基础支护相比,位移土-桩相互作用更高。甲板和桥墩在横向事件中位移的增加更多。除了墩的轴向力响应外,土-桩相互作用支撑的所有力响应都比固定基础支撑要高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号