...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Information Technology >Towards a Deconstructive Text: Beyond Language and the Politics of Absences in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot
【24h】

Towards a Deconstructive Text: Beyond Language and the Politics of Absences in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot

机译:走向解构性文本:超越语言和塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel Beckett)的《等待戈多》中的缺席政治

获取原文
           

摘要

The writing of Samuel Beckett is associated with meaning in the meaninglessness and the production of what he calls ‘literature of unword’. The casual escape from the world of words in the form of silences and pauses, in his play Waiting for Godot, urges to ask question of their existence and ultimately leads to investigate the theory behind their use in the play. This paper proposes that these absences (silence and pause) in Beckett’s play force to think ‘beyond’ language. This paper asks how silence and pause in Beckett’s text speak for the emergence of poststructuralist text. It aims to identify the significant features of the philosophy of deconstruction in the play of Beckett to demystify the hostile complicity between literature and philosophy. With the interpretive paradigm of poststructuralism this research focuses on the text as a research data. It attempts to delineate the relationship between poststructuralist theoretical concerns and text of Beckett. Keeping in view the theoretical concerns of Poststructuralist theorist Jacques Derrida, the main concern of the discussion is directed towards the notion of ‘beyond’ language into the absences that are aimed at silencing the existing discourse with the ‘radical irony’ of this anti-formal art that contains its own denial and thus represents the idea of ceaseless questioning and radical contradiction in art and any text. This article asks how text of Beckett vibrates with loud silence and has disrupted language to demonstrate the emptiness of words and thus exploring the limitless void of absences. Beckett’s text resonates with silence and pause that is neither negation nor affirmation rather a poststructuralist’s suspension of reality that is ever changing with the undecidablity of all meanings. Within the theoretical notion of Derrida’s Différance this study interprets silence and pause in Beckett’s art. The silence and pause behave like Derrida’s Différance and have questioned their own existence in the text to deconstruct any definiteness and finality of reality to extend an undecidable threshold of poststructuralists that aims to evade the ‘labyrinth of language’.
机译:塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel Beckett)的著作与无意义和他所谓的“无言文学”的产生相关。在他的剧本《等待戈多》中,以沉默和停顿的形式随意逃脱了言语世界,他敦促问问它们存在的问题,并最终导致对戏剧中其用法背后的理论的研究。本文提出,贝克特在思考“超越”语言的过程中缺乏这些能力(沉默和停顿)。本文提出了贝克特文本中的沉默和停顿如何说明后结构主义文本的出现。它旨在确定贝克特戏剧中解构哲学的重要特征,以揭开文学与哲学之间敌对共谋的神秘色彩。借助后结构主义的解释范式,本研究将文本作为研究数据。它试图勾勒出后结构主义理论关注与贝克特文本之间的关系。考虑到后结构主义理论家雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的理论关注,讨论的主要关注点是“超越”语言的概念进入了旨在将现有话语与这种反形式的“激进讽刺”相沉默的缺席中。包含自身否认的艺术,因此代表了艺术和任何文本中不断质疑和激进矛盾的观念。这篇文章问贝克特的文本是如何以巨大的沉默振动的,并破坏了语言以显示单词的空虚,从而探索了无休止的缺席。贝克特的文本在沉默与停顿之间产生共鸣,这既不是否定也不是肯定,而是后结构主义者对现实的悬浮,这种现实随着各种意义的不确定性而不断变化。在德里达(Derida)的《差异》(Différance)的理论概念内,这项研究诠释了贝克特(Beckett)的艺术中的沉默和停顿。沉默和停顿的行为就像德里达的《差异》一样,他们质疑自己在文本中的存在,以解构现实的任何确定性和终结性,从而扩大旨在逃避“语言迷宫”的后结构主义者的不确定门槛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号