...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >A comparative study of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test to assess exercise tolerance in COPD patients
【24h】

A comparative study of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test to assess exercise tolerance in COPD patients

机译:五次重复静坐试验和30秒静坐试验评估COPD患者运动耐量的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: The sit-to-stand test (STST) has been used to evaluate the exercise tolerance of patients with COPD. However, mutual comparisons to predict poor exercise tolerance have been hindered by the variety of STST modes used in previous studies, which also did not consider patients’ subjective perceptions of different STST modes. Our aim was to compare the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) with the 30-second sit-to-stand test (30STS) for predicting poor performance in the six-minute walking test and to evaluate patients’ subjective perceptions to determine the optimal mode for clinical practice. Patients and methods: Patients with stable COPD performed 5STS, 30STS and the 6MWT and then evaluated their feelings about the two STST modes by Borg dyspnea score and a questionnaire. Moreover, we collected data through the pulmonary function test, mMRC dyspnea score, COPD assessment test and quadriceps muscle strength (QMS). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the 5STS and 30STS results was used to predict 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) 350 m. Results: The final analysis included 128 patients. Similar moderate correlations were observed between 6MWT and 5STS ( r =-0.508, P 0.001) and between 6MWT and 30STS ( r =0.528, P 0.001), and there were similar correlations between QMS and 5STS ( r =-0.401, P 0.001) and between QMS and 30STS ( r =0.398, P 0.001). The 5STS and 30STS score cutoffs produced sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 76.0%, 62.8%, 56.7% and 80.3% (5STS) and 62.0%, 75.0%, 62.0% and 75.0% (30STS), respectively, for predicting poor 6MWT performance. The 5STS exhibited obvious superiority in terms of the completion rate and the subjective feelings of the participants. Conclusion: As a primary screening test for predicting poor 6MWD, the 5STS is similar to the 30STS in terms of sensitivity and specificity, but the 5STS has a better patient experience.
机译:目的:坐立试验(STST)已用于评估COPD患者的运动耐量。但是,以前的研究中使用的STST模式多种多样,因此无法相互预测运动耐受性差,这也没有考虑患者对不同STST模式的主观感知。我们的目的是比较五次重复的静坐测试(5STS)和30秒的静坐测试(30STS),以预测六分钟步行测试中的不良表现并评估患者的主观感受确定临床实践的最佳模式。患者和方法:COPD稳定的患者进行5STS,30STS和6MWT,然后通过Borg呼吸困难评分和问卷评估他们对两种STST模式的感觉。此外,我们通过肺功能测试,mMRC呼吸困难评分,COPD评估测试和四头肌肌肉强度(QMS)收集了数据。使用5STS和30STS结果的接收器工作特性曲线分析来预测6分钟步行距离(6MWD)<350 m。结果:最终分析包括128例患者。在6MWT和5STS之间(r = -0.508,P <0.001)和6MWT和30STS之间(r = 0.528,P <0.001)观察到相似的中等相关性,在QMS和5STS之间存在相似的相关性(r = -0.401,P <0.001)和QMS与30STS之间(r = 0.398,P <0.001)。 5STS和30STS得分临界值分别产生了76.0%,62.8%,56.7%和80.3%(5STS)和62.0%,75.0%,62.0%和75.0%(30STS)的敏感性,特异性和阳性和阴性预测值。预测6MWT性能不佳。 5STS在完成率和参与者的主观感受方面表现出明显的优势。结论:5STS作为预测6MWD不良的主要筛查方法,在敏感性和特异性方面类似于30STS,但5STS具有更好的患者体验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号