International Journal of Exercise Science 9(3): 368-375, 2016. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physiological characteristics of competitive, collegiate female cyclists (CFC) to data of elite female cyclists (EFC) obtained from a meta-analytic review. Eleven (n=11) CFC volunteered as subjects. Subjects signed a university approved informed consent. Means and standard deviation (+ SD) were obtained from the following measurements: age (y), 22.5± 5.1; height (cm) 167.22 ± 6.2; body mass (kg) 63.78 ± 9.71; body fat (%) 22.9 ± 3.6. Subjects performed a maximal cycling ergometer test to volitional fatigue. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max, mL*kg1*min.-1) was analyzed using a gas analyzer. VO2 max, maximal blood lactate (mM), maximal power (W), lactate threshold (mM), ventilatory threshold (VT, % of maximal) and heart rate threshold (HRT, % of maximal) were used to compare the performance of CFC to the data of EFC. An independent samples t-Test compared measures of the CFC vs. EFC. Alpha was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05. Results indicate comparisons between CFC vs. EFC, respectively: body fat %, 22.9 (3.6)* vs 15.2( 3.3); VO2 max (mL/kg/min), 58.07(6.94)* vs 52.5 ( 5.5); max power (W) 275.0( 42.5 ) vs 450.7( 256)* ;lactate threshold (mM) 3.74(0.79)* vs 2.8 ( 0.28); VT (%) 87.0( 4.1)* vs 73.2 ( 9.8) and HRT (% max) 93.1( 2.2)* vs 79.7. There were significant differences *(p < 0.05) in the aforementioned measures. Results indicate differences between CFC vs. EFC. These differences were favorable in relation to performance with both CFC and EFC.
展开▼
机译：International Journal of Exercise Science 9（3）：368-375，2016年。本研究的目的是通过从元数据获得的精英女性骑自行车者（EFC）的数据评估竞技，大学女性骑自行车者（CFC）的生理特征。分析审查。 11名（n = 11）CFC自愿作为受试者。受试者签署了大学批准的知情同意书。从以下测量获得平均值和标准偏差（±SD）：年龄（y），22.5±5.1;高度（cm）167.22±6.2;体重（kg）63.78±9.71;身体脂肪（％）22.9±3.6。受试者对最大程度的疲劳进行了最大的自行车测功测验。使用气体分析仪分析最大耗氧量（VO2 max，mL * kg1 * min.-1）。最大VO2，最大血乳酸（mM），最大功率（W），乳酸阈值（mM），通气阈值（VT，最大百分比）和心率阈值（HRT，最大百分比）用于比较CFC的性能EFC的数据。一个独立的样本t检验比较了CFC与EFC的度量。 Alpha先验设置为p≤0.05。结果表明，CFC与EFC之间的比较分别为：身体脂肪％，22.9（3.6）* vs 15.2（3.3）;最大VO2（mL / kg / min），58.07（6.94）*对52.5（5.5）;最大功率（W）275.0（42.5）vs 450.7（256）*;乳酸阈值（mM）3.74（0.79）* vs 2.8（0.28）; VT（％）87.0（4.1）* vs 73.2（9.8）和HRT（％max）93.1（2.2）* vs 79.7。上述措施之间存在显着差异*（p <0.05）。结果表明，CFC与EFC之间存在差异。这些差异对于CFC和EFC的绩效都是有利的。
展开▼
