...
首页> 外文期刊>International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences >VALIDATION OF THE GLOBAL HIGH-RESOLUTION GLOBELAND30 LAND COVER MAP IN EUROPE USING LAND COVER FIELD SURVEY DATABASE - LUCAS
【24h】

VALIDATION OF THE GLOBAL HIGH-RESOLUTION GLOBELAND30 LAND COVER MAP IN EUROPE USING LAND COVER FIELD SURVEY DATABASE - LUCAS

机译:使用土地覆被调查数据库对欧洲全球高分辨率GLOBELAND30土地覆被地图进行验证-LUCAS

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

High-resolution land cover maps are one of the technological innovations driving improvements in many fields influenced by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sensing. In particular, the GlobeLand30 (GL30), global LC map with spatial resolution of 30?m, is thought to be one of the highest quality high-resolution products. However, these LC maps require validation to determine their suitability for a particular purpose. One of the best ways to provide useful validation reference data is to do a high-level accuracy field survey, but this is time consuming and expensive. Another option is to exploit already available datasets. This study assesses thematic accuracy of GL30 in Europe using LUCAS as a validation reference, because it is a free and open field survey database. The results were generally not good, and very bad for some classes. Analysis was then restricted to a small region (Lombardy, Italy) where LC data of higher resolution than those of GL30 were available. LUCAS was also found to be incoherent with this product. Further comparisons of LUCAS with other independent sources confirmed that the LC attributes of LUCAS are inconsistent with expectations. Although these findings may not be generalized to other regions, the results warn against the suitability of LUCAS as ground truth for LC validation. The paper discusses the process of thematic accuracy assessment of the GL30 and the applicability of LUCAS for high-resolution global LC validation.
机译:高分辨率土地覆盖图是在受地理信息系统(GIS)和遥感影响的许多领域中推动改进的技术创新之一。特别是,全球分辨率为30?m的全球LC地图GlobeLand30(GL30)被认为是最高质量的高分辨率产品之一。但是,这些LC图需要进行验证才能确定它们是否适合特定目的。提供有用的验证参考数据的最佳方法之一是进行高精度的现场调查,但这既费时又昂贵。另一种选择是利用已经可用的数据集。这项研究使用LUCAS作为验证参考,评估了欧洲GL30的主题准确性,因为它是一个免费且开放的现场调查数据库。结果通常不好,对于某些班级来说非常糟糕。然后将分析限制在一个较小的区域(意大利伦巴第),在该区域可获得比GL30更高的分辨率的LC数据。还发现LUCAS与该产品不连贯。 LUCAS与其他独立来源的进一步比较证实,LUCAS的LC属性与预期不一致。尽管这些发现可能无法推广到其他地区,但结果警告了LUCAS是否适合作为LC验证的依据。本文讨论了GL30的主题准确性评估过程以及LUCAS在高分辨率全球LC验证中的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号