...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Secondary organic aerosol production from diesel vehicle exhaust: impact of aftertreatment, fuel chemistry and driving cycle
【24h】

Secondary organic aerosol production from diesel vehicle exhaust: impact of aftertreatment, fuel chemistry and driving cycle

机译:柴油车尾气产生二次有机气溶胶:后处理,燃料化学和驾驶循环的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Environmental chamber ("smog chamber") experiments were conducted toinvestigate secondary organic aerosol (SOA) production from dilute emissionsfrom two medium-duty diesel vehicles (MDDVs) and three heavy-duty dieselvehicles (HDDVs) under urban-like conditions. Some of the vehicles wereequipped with emission control aftertreatment devices, including dieselparticulate filters (DPFs), selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and dieseloxidation catalysts (DOCs). Experiments were also performed with differentfuels (100% biodiesel and low-, medium- or high-aromatic ultralow sulfurdiesel) and driving cycles (Unified Cycle,~Urban Dynamometer DrivingSchedule, and creep + idle). During normal operation, vehicles with acatalyzed DPF emitted very little primary particulate matter (PM).Furthermore, photooxidation of dilute emissions from these vehicles producedessentially no SOA (below detection limit). However, significant primary PMemissions and SOA production were measured during active DPF regenerationexperiments. Nevertheless, under reasonable assumptions about DPFregeneration frequency, the contribution of regeneration emissions to thetotal vehicle emissions is negligible, reducing PM trapping efficiency byless than 2%. Therefore, catalyzed DPFs appear to be very effective inreducing both primary PM emissions and SOA production from diesel vehicles.For both MDDVs and HDDVs without aftertreatment substantial SOA formed in thesmog chamber – with the emissions from some vehicles generating twice asmuch SOA as primary organic aerosol after 3 h of oxidation at typicalurban VOC / NOx ratios (3 : 1). Comprehensive organic gasspeciation was performed on these emissions, but less than half of themeasured SOA could be explained by traditional (speciated) SOA precursors.The remainder presumably originates from the large fraction (~30%) ofthe nonmethane organic gas emissions that could not be speciated usingtraditional one-dimensional gas chromatography. The unspeciated organics –likely comprising less volatile species such as intermediate volatilityorganic compounds – appear to be important SOA precursors; we estimate thatthe effective SOA yield (defined as the ratio of SOA mass to reactedprecursor mass) was 9 ± 6% if both speciated SOA precursors andunspeciated organics are included in the analysis. SOA production from creep+ idle operation was 3–4 times larger than SOA production from the samevehicle operated over the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS). Fuelproperties had little or no effect on primary PM emissions or SOA formation.
机译:进行了环境舱(“烟雾舱”)实验,以调查类似城市条件下由两辆中型柴油车辆(MDDV)和三辆重型柴油车辆(HDDV)的稀排放产生的二次有机气溶胶(SOA)的产生。一些车辆配备了排放控制后处理装置,包括柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF),选择性催化还原(SCR)和柴油氧化催化剂(DOC)。还使用不同的燃料(100%生物柴油和低,中或高芳香族超低硫柴油)和驾驶循环(统一循环,城市测功机驾驶时间表以及蠕变+怠速)进行了实验。在正常运行期间,具有DPF催化作用的车辆排放的初级颗粒物质(PM)很少,此外,这些车辆产生的稀薄排放物的光氧化作用基本上不会产生SOA(低于检测极限)。然而,在活跃的DPF再生实验期间,测量到了显着的主要PMemission和SOA产生。然而,在合理的DPF再生频率假设下,再生排放对车辆总排放的贡献可忽略不计,使PM捕集效率降低不到2%。因此,催化的DPF似乎在减少柴油车辆的主要PM排放和SOA产生方面都是非常有效的。对于未经后处理的MDDV和HDDV,烟雾室中形成了大量的SOA –一些车辆的排放产生的SOA量是原始有机气溶胶的两倍。在典型的城市VOC / NO x 比(3:1)下氧化3小时。对这些排放物进行了全面的有机气体形成分析,但传统SOA(指定的)前体无法解释所测得SOA的一半,其余部分大概源自无法确定的非甲烷有机气体排放量的很大一部分(约30%)。使用传统的一维气相色谱。未指明的有机物(可能包含挥发性较小的物质,例如中等挥发性的有机化合物)似乎是重要的SOA前体。我们估计,如果在分析中同时包含了指定的SOA前体和未指定的有机物,则有效的SOA产量(定义为SOA质量与反应的前体质量之比)为9±6%。蠕动+闲置操作产生的SOA产量是在市区测功机驾驶时间表(UDDS)上操作的同一车辆的SOA产生的3-4倍。燃料特性对主要PM排放或SOA形成几乎没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号