首页> 外文期刊>Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education >Effects of different text difficulty levels on Iranian EFL learners’ foreign language Reading motivation and Reading comprehension
【24h】

Effects of different text difficulty levels on Iranian EFL learners’ foreign language Reading motivation and Reading comprehension

机译:不同文字难度水平对伊朗英语学习者外语阅读动机和阅读理解的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

This study investigated the effects of different text difficulty levels on Iranian EFL learners’ foreign language reading motivation and reading comprehension. To fulfil this objective, 40 Iranian participants were selected among 50 students based on the results of Interchange Placement Test (Richards et al, Placement and Evaluation Package Interchange Third Edition/Passages Second Edition with Audio CDs, 2008). The pre-intermediate selected participants were then randomly divided into two equal groups; “i?+?1” group ( n ?=?20) and “i-1” group ( n ?=?20). Afterwards, the researchers measured the participants’ English reading comprehension by administering a researchers-made reading comprehension pre-test. Moreover, Motivation for Reading Questionnaire was also conducted. After the participants were all pre-tested, the treatment was practiced on the both groups. The participants in “i?+?1” group received reading passages beyond the current level, on the other hand, the “i-1” group received those reading passages which were below their current level. After the instruction which lasted about 3?months, a modified version of reading comprehension pre-test was administered to the both groups as posttest and finally the data were analyzed by using paired and independent samples t-tests. Moreover, Students’ answers to the questionnaire was also analyzed. The obtained results indicated that there was a significant difference between the post-tests of “i?+?1” and “i-1” groups. The findings indicated that the “i?+?1” group significantly outperformed the “i-1” group ( p ?
机译:这项研究调查了不同文字难度水平对伊朗EFL学习者的外语阅读动机和阅读理解的影响。为了实现这一目标,根据互换安置测试的结果从50名学生中选出40名伊朗参与者(Richards等人,《互换安置评估套件第三版/第二版带有音频CD,2008年)》。然后将中级前选定的参与者随机分为两组。 “ i + 1”组(n = 20)和“ i-1”(n = 20)。之后,研究人员通过进行研究人员制定的阅读理解预测来衡量参与者的英语阅读理解。此外,还进行了阅读动机调查。在所有参与者都进行了预测试之后,对两组进行了治疗。 “ i ++ 1”组的参与者收到的阅读段落超出当前水平,另一方面,“ i-1”组的参与者收到的阅读段落低于当前水平。持续约3个月的指导后,对阅读理解预测试的修改版作为后测试应用于两组,最后通过配对和独立样本t检验对数据进行分析。此外,还分析了学生对问卷的回答。获得的结果表明,“ i + 1”和“ i-1”组的后测之间存在显着差异。研究结果表明,在测试后,“ i?+?1”组的表现明显优于“ i-1”组(p?<?0.05)。此外,结果表明,“ i + 1”资料可以帮助伊朗EFL学习者提高阅读英语的动机。这项研究对教与学阅读理解有启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号