...
首页> 外文期刊>CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology >Target‐Adverse Event Profiles to Augment Pharmacovigilance: A Pilot Study With Six New Molecular Entities
【24h】

Target‐Adverse Event Profiles to Augment Pharmacovigilance: A Pilot Study With Six New Molecular Entities

机译:靶向不良事件分析可增强药物警戒性:一项关于六个新分子实体的初步研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Clinical trials can fail to detect rare adverse events (AEs). We assessed the ability of pharmacological target adverse‐event (TAE) profiles to predict AEs on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels at least 4?years after approval. TAE profiles were generated by aggregating AEs from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) reports and the FDA drug labels for drugs that hit a common target. A genetic algorithm (GA) was used to choose the adverse event (AE) case count ( N ), disproportionality score in FAERS (proportional reporting ratio (PRR)), and percent of comparator drug labels with an AE to maximize F ‐ measure. With FAERS data alone, precision, recall, and specificity were 0.57, 0.78, and 0.61, respectively. After including FDA drug label data, precision, recall, and specificity improved to 0.67, 0.81, and 0.71, respectively. Eighteen of 23 (78%) postmarket label changes were identified correctly. TAE analysis shows promise as a method to predict AEs at the time of drug approval.
机译:临床试验可能无法发现罕见的不良事件(AE)。我们评估了药理学目标不良事件(TAE)配置文件在批准后至少4年内在美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)药品标签上预测AE的能力。 TAE配置文件是通过汇总来自FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)报告和FDA达到共同目标的药物标签的AE汇总而生成的。遗传算法(GA)用于选择不良事件(AE)病例数(N),FAERS中的不成比例评分(比例报告比率(PRR))以及具有AE的比较药物标签百分比以最大化F测量。仅使用FAERS数据,精度,召回率和特异性分别为0.57、0.78和0.61。包括FDA药品标签数据后,精密度,召回率和特异性分别提高到0.67、0.81和0.71。正确识别了23种售后标签更改中的18种(78%)。 TAE分析显示了有望作为药物批准时预测不良事件的一种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号