首页> 外文期刊>Creative Education >Influence of Expert Video Feedback, Peer Video Feedback, Standard Video Feedback and Oral Feedback on Undergraduate Medical Students’ Performance of Basic Surgical Skills
【24h】

Influence of Expert Video Feedback, Peer Video Feedback, Standard Video Feedback and Oral Feedback on Undergraduate Medical Students’ Performance of Basic Surgical Skills

机译:专家视频反馈,同伴视频反馈,标准视频反馈和口头反馈对医学生本科生基本手术技能水平的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: In daily clinical practice, sterile working conditions, as well as patient safety and self-protection, are essential. Thus, these skills should be taught appropriately during undergraduate training. Receiving constructive feedback can significantly improve future performance. Furthermore, reviewing one’s performance using video tools is a useful approach. This study investigates the impact of different modes of video feedback on the acquisition of practical surgical skills, including wound management and a bedside test. Methods: Third-year medical students completed a structured training of practical skills as part of their mandatory surgery rotation. All students received the same practical skills training for performing wound management and a bedside test. However, for feedback regarding their performance, students were assigned to one of four study groups: expert video feedback (receiving feedback by an expert after reviewing the recorded performance), peer video feedback (receiving feedback by a fellow student after reviewing the recorded performance), standard video (giving feedback to a standardized video of the skill), or oral feedback (receiving feedback by an expert without a video record). Afterwards, students completed two 5-minute OSCE stations in which they were assessed with respect to their acquired competencies. Effects on long-term retention were measured at two further measurement points. Results: A total of 199 students were included in the study (48 for expert video feedback, 49 for peer video feedback, 52 for standard video feedback, and 50 for oral feedback). All teaching methods were feasible in the given timeframe of 210 minutes for each module. There were nearly no statistically significant differences among the groups with regard to the technical and non-technical ratings for the three measurement points. Conclusion: In the present study, video-assisted feedback in various forms offered no significant benefit over oral feedback alone during simulation-based patient encounters.
机译:目的:在日常临床实践中,无菌工作条件以及患者安全和自我保护至关重要。因此,这些技能应在大学训练期间适当地教授。接收建设性反馈可以大大改善未来的绩效。此外,使用视频工具查看自己的表现是一种有用的方法。这项研究调查了不同形式的视频反馈对获得实际手术技能(包括伤口处理和床旁测试)的影响。 方法:三年级医学专业的学生完成了必修的轮换手术,从而对实践技能进行了结构化培训。所有学生都接受了相同的实践技能培训,以进行伤口处理和床旁检查。但是,为了获得有关其表现的反馈,将学生分配到四个研究组之一:专家视频反馈(在查看录制的表现后接收专家的反馈),同伴视频反馈(在查看录制的表现后接收同学的反馈) ,标准视频(向技能标准视频提供反馈)或口头反馈(在没有视频记录的情况下接收专家的反馈)。之后,学生完成了两个5分钟的OSCE测站,并在其中评估了他们获得的能力。在另外两个测量点测量了对长期保留的影响。 结果:该研究总共包括199名学生(48位专家视频反馈,49位同行视频反馈,52位标准视频反馈和50位口头反馈)。在每个模块210分钟的给定时间内,所有教学方法都是可行的。在三个测量点的技术和非技术等级方面,各组之间几乎没有统计学上的显着差异。 结论:在本研究中,在基于模拟的患者相遇期间,各种形式的视频辅助反馈没有提供比单独的口头反馈明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号