首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of SMILE-4
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of SMILE-4

机译:佐芬普利在急性心肌梗死后左心室收缩功能不全患者中的成本效益:SMILE-4事后分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: In SMILE-4 (the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation 4 study), zofenopril + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was superior to ramipril + ASA in reducing the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute myocardial infarction. The present post hoc analysis was performed to compare the cost-effectiveness of zofenopril and ramipril. Methods: In total, 771 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and acute myocardial infarction were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive zofenopril 60 mg/day (n = 389) or ramipril 10 mg/day (n = 382) + ASA 100 mg/day and were followed up for one year. The primary study endpoint was the one-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. The economic analysis was based on evaluation of cost of medications and hospitalizations and was applied to the intention-to-treat population (n = 716). Cost data were drawn from the National Health Service databases of the European countries participating in the study. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used to quantify the cost per event prevented with zofenopril versus ramipril. Results: Zofenopril significantly ( P = 0.028) reduced the risk of the primary study endpoint by 30% as compared with ramipril (95% confidence interval, 4%–49%). The number needed to treat to prevent a major cardiovascular event with zofenopril was 13 less than with ramipril. The cost of drug therapies was higher with zofenopril (328.78 Euros per patient per year, n = 365) than with ramipril (165.12 Euros per patient per year, n = 351). The cost related to the occurrence of major cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization averaged 4983.64 Euros for zofenopril and 4850.01 Euros for ramipril. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for zofenopril versus ramipril was 2125.45 Euros per event prevented (worst and best case scenario in the sensitivity analysis was 3590.09 and 3243.96 Euros, respectively). Conclusion: Zofenopril is a viable and cost-effective treatment for managing patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.
机译:背景:在SMILE-4(心肌梗死的生存率长期评估4研究)中,在减少急性心肌梗死后左心功能不全患者的主要心血管事件的发生率方面,佐芬普利+乙酰水杨酸(ASA)优于雷米普利+ ASA。梗塞。进行本事后分析以比较佐芬普利和雷米普利的成本效益。方法:总共771例左心功能不全并急性心肌梗死的患者以双盲方式随机分配接受zofenopril 60 mg / day(n = 389)或雷米普利10 mg / day(n = 382)+ ASA 100 mg /天,并随访了一年。主要研究终点为因心血管原因死亡或住院的一年合并发生率。经济分析基于对药物和住院费用的评估,并应用于意向治疗人群(n = 716)。费用数据来自参与研究的欧洲国家的国家卫生服务数据库。递增的成本效益比用于量化佐芬普利和雷米普利预防的每事件成本。结果:与雷米普利相比,佐非诺普利(P = 0.028)显着降低了主要研究终点的风险30%(95%置信区间,4%–49%)。用佐芬普利治疗可预防重大心血管事件的人数比雷米普利少13。佐芬普利的药物治疗费用更高(每名患者每年328.78欧元,n = 365),比雷米普利(每名患者每年165.12欧元,n = 351)高。与需要住院治疗的重大心血管事件的发生相关的费用,佐芬普利平均为4983.64欧元,雷米普利为4850.01欧元。 zofenopril与ramipril的每次预防成本效益比增加为2125.45欧元(敏感性分析中最差和最好的情况分别为3590.09欧元和3243.96欧元)。结论:左芬普利是一种治疗急性心肌梗死后左心功能不全的可行且具有成本效益的治疗方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号