首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain

机译:在西班牙常规临床实践中,新诊断的膀胱过度活动症患者使用非索罗定柔性剂量的成本-效果分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To carry out cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Health System perspective, of treating overactive bladder (OAB), in newly diagnosed patients with two flexible doses of fesoterodine in routine clinical practice. Patients and methods: Economic evaluation of flexible-dose fesoterodine in newly diagnosed patients, including two treatment groups: standard escalating from 4 to 8 mg or fast escalating to 8 mg. Costs were estimated from health care resources utilization related to OAB, and were expressed in 2015 Euros. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from overactive bladder questionnaire-short form. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Results: Three hundred and ninety symptomatic OAB patients treated with fesoterodine and newly diagnosed (141 in fast escalating group and 249 in standard escalating) were analyzed. Adjusted health care total costs were not statistically different; difference??€4.1 (confidence interval: ?153.3; 25.1) P =0.842. QALYs were higher in fast escalating to high dose vs standard escalating group, resulting in a cost of??€16,020/QALY gained for fast escalating vs standard escalating group. Conclusion: When the cost-effectiveness threshold is set at a maximum value of €30,000/QALY gained, fesoterodine fast escalating group was cost-effective vs standard escalating group 67.6% of the time. The treatment with fesoterodine, in female patients newly diagnosed, fast escalating to 8 mg was a cost-effective option relative to escalating traditionally from 4 to 8?mg, in the management of OAB in routine clinical practice, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.
机译:目的:从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度,对常规诊断中使用两种弹性剂量的非索罗定的新诊断患者进行膀胱过度活动症(OAB)治疗,进行成本效益分析。患者和方法:在新诊断的患者中,软剂量非索罗定的经济评估,包括两个治疗组:标准剂量从4毫克增加到8毫克或快速增加到8毫克。费用是根据与OAB相关的医疗资源利用进行估算的,以2015欧元表示。从过度活跃的膀胱调查表(简短表格)中获得质量调整生命年(QALYs)。进行了单变量和概率敏感性分析。结果:分析了390例接受非索罗定治疗并新诊断的有症状的OAB患者(快速升级组141例,标准升级组249例)。调整后的医疗总费用在统计上没有差异;差异:4.1欧元(置信区间:153.3; 25.1),P = 0.842。快速上报至高剂量组的QALYs高于标准上报组,导致快速上报与标准上报组的成本为€16,020 / QALY。结论:当成本效益阈值设置为最大值€30,000 / QALY时,非索罗定快速上报组具有成本效益,而标准上报组则为67.6%。从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度来看,在常规临床实践中,在OAB的管理中,将非索罗定治疗的新诊断女性患者快速升至8 mg是相对于传统的从4 mg升至8 mg的成本效益选择。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号