首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >The cost-effectiveness of a NSCLC patient assistance program for pemetrexed maintenance therapy in People's Republic of China
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of a NSCLC patient assistance program for pemetrexed maintenance therapy in People's Republic of China

机译:中华人民共和国培美曲塞维持治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者援助计划的成本效益

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Eli Lilly and the China Primary Health Care Foundation are currently implementing a patient assistance program (PAP) in China, which allows first-line nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who complete four cycles of pemetrexed induction therapy to receive free, continuous pemetrexed maintenance therapy. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed maintenance therapy vs basic standard care (BSC) and the economic impacts of providing a PAP for pemetrexed maintenance therapy to NSCLC patients who have completed pemetrexed induction therapy in a Chinese health care setting. Methods: We developed a novel decision-analytic model to evaluate the long-term costs and clinical efficacy of pemetrexed plus BSC vs BSC alone. We utilized a three-state (progression-free survival, progressed disease, and dead) partition survival model for both the clinical and economic aspects of the analysis. Cost and health utility estimates were derived from the literature. We performed a scenario analysis to estimate the real-world impact of introducing the PAP in China by comparing the use of the PAP vs non-PAP. Model uncertainty was evaluated using one-way and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Compared to BSC, pemetrexed plus BSC resulted in a gain of 0.22 years of life (95% credible range [CR]: 0.04–0.46) and 0.13 quality-adjusted life years (95% CR: 0.04–0.26) per patient, at an increased cost of $28,105 (95% CR: ?$22,720 to $48,646) without a PAP and $3,068 (95% CR: ?$1,263 to $9,163) with a PAP. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for pemetrexed plus BSC vs BSC alone was cost-prohibitive at $222,700 for non-PAP, but cost-effective at $24,319 with a PAP. Conclusion: Our study suggests that maintenance pemetrexed therapy following pemetrexed induction for patients with advanced NSCLC is likely to be highly non-cost-effective in the absence of a PAP, but the pending implementation of the PAP promises to make it cost-effective, with a >90% probability of cost-effectiveness at a Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold per quality-adjusted life year.
机译:背景:礼来制药和中国初级卫生保健基金会目前正在中国实施患者援助计划(PAP),该计划允许一线非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者完成培美曲塞诱导治疗的四个周期,接受免费的持续培美曲塞维持治疗。目的:评估培美曲塞维持治疗与基本标准护理(BSC)的成本效益,以及为中国医疗机构中完成培美曲塞诱导治疗的NSCLC患者提供培美曲塞维持治疗的PAP的经济影响。方法:我们开发了一种新颖的决策分析模型,以评估培美曲塞加BSC与单纯BSC的长期费用和临床疗效。对于分析的临床和经济方面,我们利用了三态(无进展生存期,疾病进展和死亡)分区生存模型。成本和卫生效用估算值来自文献。我们通过比较PAP和非PAP的使用情况,进行了情景分析,以评估在中国引入PAP的现实影响。使用单向和多元概率敏感性分析评估模型不确定性。结果:与BSC相比,培美曲塞加BSC可使每位患者的寿命延长0.22年(95%可信范围[CR]:0.04–0.46),质量调整的寿命年延长0.13(95%CR:0.04–0.26),不带PAP的成本增加了28,105美元(95%CR:22,720美元至48,646美元),带PAP的成本增加了3,068美元(95%CR:1,263美元至9,163美元)。对于非PAP而言,培美曲塞加BSC与单独BSC的成本效益比增加为222,700美元,但PAP成本效益为24,319美元。结论:我们的研究表明,在没有PAP的情况下,培美曲塞诱导治疗晚期NSCLC患者维持培美曲塞治疗可能非成本效益很高,但是PAP的待定实施有望使其具有成本效益,在每个质量调整生命年的中国人愿意支付的门槛下,成本效益的可能性> 90%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号