...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinics >Comparison of therapeutic effects between drainage blood reinfusion and temporary clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
【24h】

Comparison of therapeutic effects between drainage blood reinfusion and temporary clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

机译:类风湿关节炎患者全膝关节置换术后引流回输与临时钳夹引流的疗效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects between drainage blood reinfusion and temporary clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis to provide a basis for clinical practice. METHODS: Data from 83 patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed. The 83 patients were divided into a drainage blood reinfusion group (DR group, n = 45) and a temporary clamping drainage group (CD group, n = 38). In the DR group, postoperative drainage blood was used for autotransfusion. In the CD group, closed drainage was adopted, and the drainage tube was clamped for 2 h postoperatively followed by patency. The postoperative drainage amount, hemoglobin level, rate and average volume of allogeneic blood transfusion, swelling and ecchymosis of the affected knee joint, time to straight-leg raising and range of active knee flexion were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total drainage volume was higher in the DR group than in the CD group (P = 0.000). The average volume of postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion (P = 0.000) and the decrease in the hemoglobin level 24 h after total knee arthroplasty (P = 0.012) were lower in the DR group than in the CD group. Swelling and ecchymosis of the affected knee joint, time to straight-leg raising and the range of active knee flexion were improved in the DR group compared with the CD group (all P0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with temporary clamping drainage, drainage blood reinfusion after total knee arthroplasty can reduce the allogeneic blood transfusion volume and is conducive to early rehabilitation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
机译:目的:比较类风湿关节炎患者全膝关节置换术后引流回输与临时钳夹引流的治疗效果,为临床实践提供依据。方法:回顾性分析83例风湿性关节炎全膝关节置换术患者的数据。 83例患者分为引流回输组(DR组,n = 45)和临时钳夹引流组(CD组,n = 38)。在DR组中,使用术后引流血进行自体输血。 CD组采用闭式引流,术后2小时将引流管夹紧,并保持通畅。比较两组的术后引流量,血红蛋白水平,同种异体输血率和平均体积,患膝关节肿胀和瘀斑,直腿抬高时间和活动屈膝范围。结果:DR组的总引流量高于CD组(P = 0.000)。 DR组术后平均异体输血量(P = 0.000)和全膝关节置换术后24小时血红蛋白水平的降低(P = 0.012)低于CD组。与CD组相比,DR组患膝关节肿胀和瘀斑,直腿抬起时间和活动膝关节屈伸范围均有改善(所有P <0.05)。结论:与临时钳夹引流相比,全膝关节置换术后引流回输可减少异体输血量,有利于类风湿关节炎患者的早期康复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号