首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma >Validity and Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index and Australasian Triage System in Pediatric Emergency Care of Mofid Children's Hospital in Iran
【24h】

Validity and Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index and Australasian Triage System in Pediatric Emergency Care of Mofid Children's Hospital in Iran

机译:伊朗莫菲德儿童医院儿科急诊中的紧急程度指数和澳大利亚分诊系统的有效性和可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and Australasian Triage System (ATS) for children visiting admitted to the emergency department (ED).Methods: This was a prospective study occurred in the Mofid??children's??Hospital in Iran from August 2017 to November 2018 and children had aged a?¤14 years and presented at the ED with a medical symptom were considered eligible for participation. This study was divided into two phases: in the first phase, we determined the inter-rater reliability of ESI version 4 and ATS by triage nurses and pediatric residents. In the second phase, to analyze the validity, sensitivity, and specificity of each triage system. Reliability and agreement rates were measured using kappa statistics.Results: ESI showed inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.65a??0.92 (P0.001) and ATS showed inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.51a??0.87 ESI had sensitivity ranged from 81% to 95% and specificity ranged from 73% to 86%. In addition, sensitivity ranged of the ATS were 80% to 95% and specificity ranged from 74% to 87%. Under triage and over triage occurred in 12% and 15% of patients respectively in ESI and 13% and 15% of patients respectively in ATS.Conclusion: The ESI and ATS both valid to triage children in the ED section of Mofid??children's??Hospital paediatric. Reliability of the ESI is good, moderate to good for the ATS.
机译:目的:评估急诊严重程度指数(ESI)和澳大利亚分流系统(ATS)对进入急诊科(ED)的儿童的有效性,可靠性,敏感性和特异性。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究。 2017年8月至2018年11月在伊朗的Mofid儿童医院,年龄在14岁以下且在ED上出现医学症状的儿童被认为符合参加条件。这项研究分为两个阶段:在第一阶段,我们由分流护士和儿科住院医师确定了ESI版本4和ATS的评分者间可靠性。在第二阶段,分析每个分类系统的有效性,敏感性和特异性。结果:ESI显示评分者间信度,kappa为0.65a ?? 0.92(P <0.001),ATS显示评分者间信度,kappa为0.51a?0.87。从81%到95%,特异性从73%到86%。此外,ATS的灵敏度范围为80%至95%,特异性范围为74%至87%。在ESI中,分别有12%和15%的患者发生过分流和过度分流,在ATS中分别发生了13%和15%的患者。结论:ESI和ATS都可以对Mofid儿童医院ED部分进行分流。医院儿科。 ESI的可靠性是良好的,对于ATS来说是中等到良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号