首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Cross-sectional study on nurses’ attitudes regarding coercive measures: the importance of socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, and strategies for coping with stress
【24h】

Cross-sectional study on nurses’ attitudes regarding coercive measures: the importance of socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, and strategies for coping with stress

机译:横断面研究护士对强制措施的态度:社会人口统计学特征,工作满意度和应对压力策略的重要性

获取原文
           

摘要

Coercive measures are containment methods used in psychiatry to curb patients’ disruptive and aggressive behaviours towards themselves, others or objects. The prevalence of the practice of coercive measures in psychiatry is directly related to the attitudes of the staff. When discussing these attitudes, nurses are often particularly singled out. The purpose of the study is to research the impact of individual factors on nurses’ attitudes in the decision-making process for the use of coercive measures. A cross-sectional study among all psychiatric nursing staff in Slovenia (n?=?367, 79%) was conducted over the years 2013/2014. Standardized questionnaires were used, including a survey of nurses’ attitudes to the use of seclusion, the Job Descriptive Index, and the Folkman-Lazarus test. Nurses’ attitudes towards special coercive measures are predominantly negative ( x ˉ $$ overline{x} $$ = 11.312, SD?=?2.641). The factors that explain a positive attitude are as follows: female gender (β?=???0.236, p?< 0.001), fewer years of service (β?=???0.149, p?=?0.023), emotion-focused strategies of coping with stress (β?=?0.139, p?=?0.020), and less-threatening patient behaviour (β?=?0.157, p?=?0.012). The effects of some known factors did not prove important in the model. Newly recognized factors are “less-threatening patient behaviour” and “emotion-focused strategies of coping with stress”. Therefore, attitudes towards special coercive measures in psychiatry must be regarded as contextualized, interactive, and multidimensional phenomena that cannot be explained merely through a defined set of factors.
机译:强制措施是精神病学中用于遏制患者对自己,他人或物体的破坏性和攻击性行为的遏制方法。精神病学中采取强制措施的普遍性与工作人员的态度直接相关。在讨论这些态度时,通常会特别挑剔护士。该研究的目的是研究在使用强制措施的决策过程中各个因素对护士态度的影响。在2013/2014年间,对斯洛文尼亚的所有精神科护理人员进行了横断面研究(n = 367,79%)。使用了标准化的问卷,包括对护士对隔离使用的态度的调查,工作描述指数和Folkman-Lazarus检验。护士对特殊强制措施的态度主要是消极的(x = $$ overline {x} $$ = 11.312,SD == 2.641)。解释积极态度的因素如下:女性(β= 0.236,p <0.001),服务年限短(β= 0.149,p = 0.023),情绪低落-集中应对压力的策略(β= 0.139,p = 0.020)和威胁较小的患者行为(β= 0.157,p = 0.012)。在模型中,一些已知因素的影响并不重要。新近公认的因素是“威胁性较小的患者行为”和“以情绪为导向的应对压力的策略”。因此,对精神病学采取特殊强制措施的态度必须被视为情境化,互动性和多维现象,这些现象不能仅通过一组确定的因素来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号