...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach
【24h】

What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a ‘best fit’ framework approach

机译:在英国,那些直接怀孕的健康女性会对出生地的偏好,选择和决策产生什么影响?使用“最适合”框架方法进行定性证据综合

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background English maternity care policy has supported offering women choice of birth setting for over twenty years, but only 13% of women in England currently give birth in settings other than obstetric units (OUs). It is unclear why uptake of non-OU settings for birth remains relatively low. This paper presents a synthesis of qualitative evidence which explores influences on women’s experiences of birth place choice, preference and decision-making from the perspectives of women using maternity services. Methods Qualitative evidence synthesis of UK research published January 1992-March 2015, using a ‘best-fit’ framework approach. Searches were run in seven electronic data bases applying a comprehensive search strategy. Thematic framework analysis was used to synthesise extracted data from included studies. Results Twenty-four papers drawing on twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis identified support for the key framework themes. Women’s experiences of choosing or deciding where to give birth were influenced by whether they received information about available options and about the right to choose, women’s preferences for different services and their attributes, previous birth experiences, views of family, friends and health care professionals and women’s beliefs about risk and safety. The synthesis additionally identified that women’s access to choice of place of birth during the antenatal period varied. Planning to give birth in OU was straightforward, but although women considering birth in a setting other than hospital OU were sometimes well-supported, they also encountered obstacles and described needing to ‘counter the negativity’ surrounding home birth or birth in midwife-led settings. Conclusions Over the period covered by the review, it was straightforward for low risk women to opt for hospital birth in the UK. Accessing home birth was more complex and contested. The evidence on freestanding midwifery units (FMUs) is more limited, but suggests that women wanting to opt for an FMU birth experienced similar barriers. The extent to which women experienced similar problems accessing alongside midwifery units (AMUs) is unclear. Women’s preferences for different birth options, particularly for ‘hospital’ vs non-hospital settings, are shaped by their pre-existing values, beliefs and experience, and not all women are open to all birth settings.
机译:背景技术英国的产妇保健政策已经为妇女提供了超过20年的生育选择选择权,但英国目前只有13%的妇女在产科以外的地方生育。目前尚不清楚为什么非OU设置的出生率仍然相对较低。本文提供了定性证据的综合,从妇女使用生育服务的角度探讨了对妇女出生地选择,偏好和决策的经历的影响。方法采用“最适合”框架方法,于1992年1月至2015年3月发表了英国研究的定性证据综合报告。使用全面的搜索策略在七个电子数据库中进行搜索。主题框架分析用于综合从纳入研究中提取的数据。结果二十项研究的二十四篇论文符合入选标准。该综述确定了对关键框架主题的支持。妇女是否选择或决定在何处分娩的经历受到以下因素的影响:她们是否收到有关可用选择和选择权的信息,妇女对不同服务的偏好及其属性,以前的生育经历,家庭,朋友和保健专业人员的看法以及妇女对风险和安全的信念。该综合报告还表明,妇女在产前期间选择出生地的方式有所不同。计划在OU中分娩很简单,但是尽管考虑在医院OU以外的环境中分娩的妇女有时得到了充分的支持,但她们也遇到了障碍,并描述了需要“应对消极”的家庭分娩或助产士主导的分娩情况。结论在审查所涵盖的时期内,低风险妇女在英国选择住院分娩很简单。在家分娩更为复杂且存在争议。关于独立助产士单位(FMU)的证据较为有限,但表明希望选择FMU分娩的妇女也经历了类似的障碍。妇女在与助产科(AMU​​)一起使用时遇到类似问题的程度尚不清楚。妇女对不同生育方式的偏爱,尤其是对“医院”与非医院环境的偏爱,是由她们先前的价值观,信仰和经验决定的,并非所有妇女都对所有生育环境敞开怀抱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号