...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with One-to-one midwifery Support: a randomised controlled trial

机译:COSMOS:将一对一的助产士支持与标准的产妇护理进行比较:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In Australia and internationally, there is concern about the growing proportion of women giving birth by caesarean section. There is evidence of increased risk of placenta accreta and percreta in subsequent pregnancies as well as decreased fertility; and significant resource implications. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of continuity of midwifery care have reported reduced caesareans and other interventions in labour, as well as increased maternal satisfaction, with no statistically significant differences in perinatal morbidity or mortality. RCTs conducted in the UK and in Australia have largely measured the effect of teams of care providers (commonly 6–12 midwives) with very few testing caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care. This study aims to determine whether caseload (one-to-one) midwifery care for women at low risk of medical complications decreases the proportion of women delivering by caesarean section compared with women receiving 'standard' care. This paper presents the trial protocol in detail. Methods/design A two-arm RCT design will be used. Women who are identified at low medical risk will be recruited from the antenatal booking clinics of a tertiary women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Baseline data will be collected, then women randomised to caseload midwifery or standard low risk care. Women allocated to the caseload intervention will receive antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a designated primary midwife with one or two antenatal visits conducted by a 'back-up' midwife. The midwives will collaborate with obstetricians and other health professionals as necessary. If the woman has an extended labour, or if the primary midwife is unavailable, care will be provided by the back-up midwife. For women allocated to standard care, options include midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care and community based general medical practitioner care. Data will be collected at recruitment (self administered survey) and at 2 and 6 months postpartum by postal survey. Medical/obstetric outcomes will be abstracted from the medical record. The sample size of 2008 was calculated to identify a decrease in caesarean birth from 19 to 14% and detect a range of other significant clinical differences. Comprehensive process and economic evaluations will be conducted. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000073404.
机译:背景技术在澳大利亚和国际上,人们对通过剖腹产分娩的妇女比例越来越高感到担忧。有证据表明,在随后的怀孕中胎盘积聚和排泄的风险增加,以及生育力下降;以及重大的资源影响。持续进行助产士护理的随机对照试验(RCT)报告说,剖腹产和其他分娩干预措施减少了,产妇满意度提高了,围产期发病率或死亡率没有统计学上的显着差异。在英国和澳大利亚进行的RCT很大程度上衡量了护理提供者团队(通常为6至12名助产士)的效果,而测试病例数量(一对一)的助产士护理却很少。这项研究旨在确定与那些接受“标准”护理的妇女相比,医疗并发症风险较低的妇女的病例(一对一)助产护理是否减少了剖宫产妇女的比例。本文详细介绍了该试验方案。方法/设计将使用两臂RCT设计。被确定为低医疗风险的妇女将从澳大利亚墨尔本一家三级妇女医院的产前预约诊所招募。将收集基线数据,然后将妇女随机分配到助产士或标准的低风险护理中。分担工作量干预措施的妇女将从指定的主要助产士那里接受产前,产中和产后护理,并由“后备”助产士进行一两次产前检查。助产士将在必要时与产科医生和其他卫生专业人员合作。如果妇女分娩时间长,或者没有主要的助产士,则备用助产士将提供护理。对于分配给标准护理的妇女,选择包括助产士领导的具有不同连续性水平的护理,初级产科护理和基于社区的全科医生护理。数据将在招聘时(自我管理调查)以及产后2个月和6个月通过邮政调查收集。医疗/产科结果将从病历中提取。计算2008年的样本量,以确定剖腹产从19%减少到14%,并检测一系列其他显着的临床差异。将进行全面的过程和经济评估。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN012607000073404。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号