...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
【24h】

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

机译:Cochrane系统评价数据库中与儿童相关的系统评价的描述性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence available in SRs and gaps in the evidence base where SRs are required. The objective of this study was to describe child-relevant SRs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, Issue 2, 2009). Methods SRs were assessed for relevance using pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and entered into an electronic form. Univariate analyses were performed to describe the SRs overall and by topic area. Results The search yielded 1666 SRs; 793 met the inclusion criteria. 38% of SRs were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2007. Corresponding authors were most often from the UK (41%). Most SRs (59%) examined pharmacological interventions. 53% had at least one external source of funding. SRs included a median of 7 studies (IQR 3, 15) and 679 participants (IQR 179, 2833). Of all studies, 48% included only children, and 27% only adults. 94% of studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Primary outcomes were specified in 72% of SRs. Allocation concealment and the Jadad scale were used in 97% and 25% of SRs, respectively. Adults and children were analyzed separately in 12% of SRs and as a subgroup analysis in 14%. Publication bias was assessed in only 14% of SRs. A meta-analysis was conducted in 68% of SRs with a median of 5 trials (IQR 3, 9) each. Variations in these characteristics were observed across topic areas. Conclusions We described the methodological characteristics and rigour of child-relevant reviews in the CDSR. Many SRs are not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria. Our study describes variation in conduct and reporting across SRs and reveals clinicians' ability to access child-specific data.
机译:背景技术系统评价(SR)被认为是决策的重要工具。最近没有全面鉴定或描述与儿童相关的SR。对现有与儿童相关的SR的描述将有助于识别SR中可用的与儿童相关的证据的程度以及需要SR的证据库中的空白。这项研究的目的是描述Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR,2009年第2期)中与儿童相关的SR。方法使用预定义的标准评估SR的相关性。提取数据并输入电子表格。进行了单变量分析以描述整体和按主题领域的SR。结果搜索得到1666个SR。 793名符合纳入标准。 38%的SR是在2007年之前最新评估的。相应的作者通常来自英国(41%)。大多数SR(59%)检查了药理干预措施。 53%的人至少有一个外部资金来源。 SR包括7个研究(IQR 3、15)和679名参与者(IQR 179、2833)的中位数。在所有研究中,48%仅包括儿童,27%仅包括成人。 94%的研究发表在同行评审的期刊上。在72%的SR中指定了主要结局。 97%和25%的SR使用分配隐藏和Jadad量表。成人和儿童分别在12%的SR中进行了分析,并在14%的人群中进行了亚组分析。仅在14%的SR中评估了出版偏倚。对68%的SR进行了荟萃分析,每项均进行了5次试验(IQR 3、9)。跨主题领域观察到这些特征的变化。结论我们描述了CDSR中儿童相关评论的方法学特征和严谨性。根据Cochrane标准,许多SR不是最新的。我们的研究描述了各个SR的行为和报告的差异,并揭示了临床医生访问特定于儿童的数据的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号