...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Influence of response instructions and response format on applicant perceptions of a situational judgement test for medical school selection
【24h】

Influence of response instructions and response format on applicant perceptions of a situational judgement test for medical school selection

机译:回答说明和回答格式对申请人选择医学院校情况判断测试的理解的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

This study examined the influence of two Situational Judgement Test (SJT) design features (response instructions and response format) on applicant perceptions. Additionally, we investigated demographic subgroup differences in applicant perceptions of an SJT. Medical school applicants (N?=?372) responded to an online survey on applicant perceptions, including a description and two example items of an SJT. Respondents randomly received one of four SJT versions (should do-rating, should do-pick-one, would do-rating, would do-pick-one). They rated overall favourability and items on four procedural justice factors (face validity, applicant differentiation, study relatedness and chance to perform) and ease-of-cheating. Additionally, applicant perceptions were compared for subgroups based on gender, ethnic background and first-generation university status. Applicants rated would-do instructions as easier to cheat than should-do instructions. Rating formats received more favourable judgements than pick-one formats on applicant differentiation, study-relatedness, chance to perform and ease of cheating. No significant main effect for demographic subgroup on applicant perceptions was found, but significant interaction effects showed that certain subgroups might have more pronounced preferences for certain SJT design features. Specifically, ethnic minority applicants – but not ethnic majority applicants – showed greater preference for should-do than would-do instructions. Additionally, first-generation university students – but not non-first-generation university students – were more favourable of rating formats than of pick-one formats. Findings indicate that changing SJT design features may positively affect applicant perceptions by promoting procedural justice factors and reducing perceived ease of cheating and that response instructions and response format can increase the attractiveness of SJTs for minority applicants.
机译:这项研究检查了两种情况判断测试(SJT)设计功能(响应说明和响应格式)对申请人认知的影响。此外,我们调查了SJT申请人认知中的人口统计子组差异。医学院的申请者(N = 372)回答了关于申请者看法的在线调查,包括SJT的描述和两个示例项目。受访者随机收到了四个SJT版本之一(应进行评分,应选择一项,应进行评分,应进行一次挑选)。他们在四个程序公正性因素(面子效度,申请人差异,研究相关性和执行机会)和作弊容易性上对总体有利性和项目进行了评估。此外,根据性别,种族背景和第一代大学地位对亚组的申请人感知进行了比较。申请人将“应做说明”比“应做说明”更容易作弊。与选择者格式相比,评分格式在申请人差异,研究相关性,执行的机会和作弊的容易性方面获得了更有利的判断。没有发现人口统计学亚组对申请人认知的显着主要影响,但是显着的交互作用表明,某些亚组可能对某些SJT设计功能具有更明显的偏好。具体而言,少数族裔申请人(而非少数族裔申请人)表现出比应做指示更大的偏好。此外,第一代大学生(而非非第一代大学生)在评分格式上比在选拔格式上更有利。研究结果表明,改变SJT设计功能可能会通过促进程序正义因素并减少欺骗的易感性而对申请人的认知产生积极影响,并且回复说明和回复格式可以提高SJT对少数申请人的吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号