首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >A randomised active-controlled trial to examine the effects of an online mindfulness intervention on executive control, critical thinking and key thinking dispositions in a university student sample
【24h】

A randomised active-controlled trial to examine the effects of an online mindfulness intervention on executive control, critical thinking and key thinking dispositions in a university student sample

机译:一项随机对照试验,旨在研究在线正念干预对大学生样本中执行控制,批判性思维和关键思维倾向的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Arguments for including mindfulness instruction in higher education have included claims about the benefits of mindfulness practice for critical thinking. While there is theoretical support for this claim, empirical support is limited. The aim of this study was to test this claim by investigating the effects of an online mindfulness intervention on executive function, critical thinking skills and associated thinking dispositions. Method Participants recruited from a university were randomly allocated, following screening, to either a mindfulness meditation group or a sham meditation group. Both the researchers and the participants were blind to group allocation. The intervention content for both groups was delivered through the Headspace online application, an application which provides guided meditations to users. Both groups were requested to complete 30 guided mindfulness meditation sessions across a 6?week period. Primary outcome measures assessed mindfulness, executive functioning, critical thinking, actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition. Secondary outcome measures assessed wellbeing, positive and negative affect, and real-world outcomes. Results In a series of full-information maximum likelihood analyses, significant increases in mindfulness dispositions and critical thinking scores were observed in both the mindfulness meditation and sham meditation groups. However, no significant effects of group allocation were observed for either primary or secondary measures. Furthermore, mediation analyses testing the indirect effect of group allocation through executive functioning performance did not reveal a significant result and moderation analyses showed that the effect of the intervention did not depend on baseline levels of the key thinking dispositions, actively open-minded thinking and need for cognition. Conclusion No evidence was found to suggest that engaging in guided mindfulness practice for 6?weeks using the online intervention method applied in this study improves critical thinking performance. While further research is warranted, claims regarding the benefits of mindfulness practice for critical thinking should be tempered in the meantime. Trial registration The study was initially registered in the AEA Social Science Registry before the recruitment was initiated (RCT ID: AEARCTR-0000756; 14/11/2015) and retrospectively registered in the ISRCTN registry ( RCT ID: ISRCTN16588423 ) in line with requirements for publishing the study protocol.
机译:背景技术在高等教育中纳入正念教学的论点包括有关正念练习对批判性思维的好处的主张。尽管对该主张有理论上的支持,但经验上的支持是有限的。这项研究的目的是通过调查在线正念干预对执行功能,批判性思维技巧和相关思维倾向的影响,来检验这一主张。方法从大学招募的参与者经过筛选后被随机分配到正念冥想组或假想冥想组。研究人员和参与者都对小组分配视而不见。两组的干预内容均通过“顶空”在线应用程序提供,该应用程序为用户提供指导性冥想。两组都要求在6周的时间内完成30次指导性正念冥想课程。主要结果指标评估正念,执行功能,批判性思维,积极开放的思维和认知需求。次要结局指标评估幸福感,正面和负面影响以及现实世界的结局。结果在一系列全信息最大似然分析中,在正念冥想和假想冥想组中,均观察到正念倾向和批判性思维得分的显着增加。但是,无论是主要措施还是次要措施,均未观察到组分配的显着影响。此外,调解分析通过执行功能绩效测试了小组分配的间接影响,并未发现显着的结果;调节分析表明,干预的效果并不取决于关键思维倾向的基线水平,积极开放的思维和需要进行认知。结论没有证据表明使用本研究中使用的在线干预方法进行6周的指导性正念练习可提高批判性思维表现。尽管有必要进行进一步的研究,但与此同时,应注意有关正念练习对批判性思维的好处的主张。试验注册该项研究最初在招募开始之前已在AEA社会科学注册中心注册(RCT ID:AEARCTR-0000756; 2015年11月14日),并根据要求进行了追溯注册到ISRCTN注册中心(RCT ID:ISRCTN16588423)。发布研究方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号