首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >The postoperative bleeding rate and its risk factors in patients on antithrombotic therapy who undergo gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
【24h】

The postoperative bleeding rate and its risk factors in patients on antithrombotic therapy who undergo gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

机译:胃镜下黏膜下剥离抗凝治疗患者术后出血率及其危险因素

获取原文
           

摘要

Background There is a lack of consensus regarding the risk of postoperative hemorrhage in patients on antithrombotic therapy who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We examined postoperative bleeding rates and risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage from post-ESD gastric ulcers in patients on antithrombotic therapy. Methods The subjects of this study were 833 patients who underwent ESD of gastric tumors. Of these, 743 were not on antithrombotic therapy and 90 were on some form of antithrombotic therapy (46 on low-dose aspirin (LDA) only, 23 on LDA?+?thienopyridine, and 21 on LDA?+?warfarin). All patients commenced proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy immediately postoperatively. Antiplatelet agents were discontinued for 7?days preoperatively and postoperative Day 1, and anticoagulants for 5?days preoperatively and postoperative Day 1. Results The postoperative bleeding rate in the antithrombotic group was 23.3%, significantly higher than the 2.0% observed in the non-antithrombotic group. Significant differences were seen in patients in the antithrombotic group with and without postoperative bleeding according to ESD duration (p?=?0.041), PPI?+?mucosal protective agent combination therapy (p?=?0.039), and LDA?+?warfarin combination therapy (p? Conclusions The risk of postoperative hemorrhage following gastric ESD was higher in patients with antithrombotic therapy than in those without that therapy. Among these patients, LDA?+?warfarin combination therapy and longer ESD duration were significant risk factors for postoperative bleeding. On the contrary, a mucosal protective agent to PPI therapy, lowering the odds ratio for postoperative bleeding, which suggests that the addition of a mucosal protective agent might be effective in preventing post-ESD hemorrhage in patients on antithrombotic therapy.
机译:背景对于接受内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的抗栓治疗的患者术后出血的风险尚缺乏共识。我们检查了抗血栓治疗患者的术后出血率和ESD后胃溃疡术后出血的危险因素。方法本研究的受试者为833例接受了胃肿瘤ESD治疗的患者。其中有743人未接受抗栓治疗,有90人未接受某种形式的抗栓治疗(仅在小剂量阿司匹林(LDA)上服用46种,在LDA +噻吩并吡啶上服用23种,在LDA + +华法林上服用21种)。所有患者术后立即开始质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗。术前和术后第1天停用抗血小板药7天,术前和术后第1天停用抗凝剂5天。结果抗血栓组的术后出血率为23.3%,显着高于非血栓形成组的2.0%。抗血栓形成组。根据ESD持续时间(p?=?0.041),PPI?+粘膜保护剂联合治疗(p?=?0.039)和LDA?+?华法林,在有无术后出血的抗血栓组患者中观察到显着差异。结论接受抗栓治疗的患者发生胃ESD术后出血的风险要高于未接受抗栓治疗的患者。在这些患者中,LDA +华法林联合治疗和更长的ESD持续时间是术后出血的重要危险因素相反,使用粘膜保护剂进行PPI治疗可降低术后出血的几率,这表明在使用抗栓剂治疗的患者中添加粘膜保护剂可能有效预防ESD术后出血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号