首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Decision support in psychiatry – a comparison between the diagnostic outcomes using a computerized decision support system versus manual diagnosis
【24h】

Decision support in psychiatry – a comparison between the diagnostic outcomes using a computerized decision support system versus manual diagnosis

机译:精神病学中的决策支持–使用计算机决策支持系统的诊断结果与手动诊断之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Correct diagnosis in psychiatry may be improved by novel diagnostic procedures. Computerized Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are suggested to be able to improve diagnostic procedures, but some studies indicate possible problems. Therefore, it could be important to investigate CDSS systems with regard to their feasibility to improve diagnostic procedures as well as to save time. Methods This study was undertaken to compare the traditional 'paper and pencil' diagnostic method SCID1 with the computer-aided diagnostic system CB-SCID1 to ascertain processing time and accuracy of diagnoses suggested. 63 clinicians volunteered to participate in the study and to solve two paper-based cases using either a CDSS or manually. Results No major difference between paper and pencil and computer-supported diagnosis was found. Where a difference was found it was in favour of paper and pencil. For example, a significantly shorter time was found for paper and pencil for the difficult case, as compared to computer support. A significantly higher number of correct diagnoses were found in the diffilt case for the diagnosis 'Depression' using the paper and pencil method. Although a majority of the clinicians found the computer method supportive and easy to use, it took a longer time and yielded fewer correct diagnoses than with paper and pencil. Conclusion This study could not detect any major difference in diagnostic outcome between traditional paper and pencil methods and computer support for psychiatric diagnosis. Where there were significant differences, traditional paper and pencil methods were better than the tested CDSS and thus we conclude that CDSS for diagnostic procedures may interfere with diagnosis accuracy. A limitation was that most clinicians had not previously used the CDSS system under study. The results of this study, however, confirm that CDSS development for diagnostic purposes in psychiatry has much to deal with before it can be used for routine clinical purposes.
机译:背景技术可以通过新颖的诊断程序改善精神病学中的正确诊断。建议使用计算机决策支持系统(CDSS)来改善诊断程序,但一些研究表明可能存在问题。因此,对CDSS系统进行可行性研究以改进诊断程序并节省时间可能很重要。方法本研究将传统的“纸和笔”诊断方法SCID1与计算机辅助诊断系统CB-SCID1进行比较,以确定所建议的诊断的处理时间和准确性。 63名临床医生自愿参加了这项研究,并使用CDSS或手动解决了两个纸质病例。结果发现纸和铅笔之间没有重大差异,计算机支持的诊断也没有发现。发现差异的地方是纸张和铅笔。例如,与计算机支持相比,发现困难情况下的纸和铅笔时间大大缩短。使用纸和铅笔方法在弥漫性病例中发现的“抑郁症”诊断正确率要高得多。尽管大多数临床医生发现该计算机方法具有支持性且易于使用,但与用纸和铅笔相比,它花费了更长的时间并且产生的正确诊断更少。结论:本研究无法发现传统的纸笔方法与计算机支持的精神病学诊断结果之间的重大差异。在存在显着差异的地方,传统的纸张和铅笔方法比经过测试的CDSS更好,因此我们得出结论,用于诊断程序的CDSS可能会干扰诊断准确性。局限性在于,大多数临床医生以前并未使用正在研究的CDSS系统。然而,这项研究的结果证实,在精神病学中用于诊断目的的CDSS开发在将其用于常规临床目的之前还需要处理很多工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号