...
首页> 外文期刊>Danish Medical Bulletin >Long-lasting functional abdominal pain and duodenal ulcer are associated with stress, vulnerability and symptoms of psychological stress. A controlled study including healthy and patient controls.
【24h】

Long-lasting functional abdominal pain and duodenal ulcer are associated with stress, vulnerability and symptoms of psychological stress. A controlled study including healthy and patient controls.

机译:持久的功能性腹痛和十二指肠溃疡与压力,脆弱性和心理压力症状相关。一项包括健康和患者对照的对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess psychological differences between patients with functional abdominal pain (FUNC) and three separate control groups comprising patients with duodenal ulcer (DU), patients with gallstone or urinary tract stone (STONE), and healthy non-patient controls (HEALTH). METHODS: All participants completed a self-administered questionnaire including questions about the relationship between symptoms and certain life events and psychometric tests for psychological distress (SCL-90) and vulnerability. PARTICIPANTS: The FUNC group consisted of 27 hospital outpatients with long-lasting abdominal pain without demonstrable abnormalities (ten men and 17 women; mean age 38 years). The DU group consisted of 13 untreated outpatients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer (nine men and four women; mean age 42 years) while the STONE group comprised 13 untreated patients with gallstone (n = 7) or urinary calculi (n = 6) (six men and seven women; mean age 43 years). The HEALTH group consisted of five men and nine women (mean age 36 years). RESULTS: Significantly more FUNC and DU patients compared with STONE patients experienced an association with at least one of 14 life events (74%, 77%, and 31%, respectively; p = 0.02). The FUNC and DU groups showed significantly higher scores on the depression subscale of the SCL-90 than the HEALTH group (p < 0.05), and on the anxiety subscale compared with the STONE and HEALTH groups (p < 0.05). The FUNC group scored significantly higher on the somatization subscale compared with all the other groups (p < 0.05). As an overall measure of psychological distress the Global Severity Index (GSI) was calculated. GSI was significantly higher in the FUNC group compared with the HEALTH group (p < 0.01) and tended to be higher in the DU group (p = 0.06). The FUNC and DU groups had significantly higher scores for vulnerability than the STONE and HEALTH groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: FUNC as well as DU outpatients seem to be more psychologically distressed and vulnerable than healthycontrols or outpatients suffering from pain caused by stones in the gallbladder or urinary tract. As opposed to the STONE group, a high proportion of the FUNC and DU patients experienced that the onset or aggravation of abdominal pain was associated with certain life events. The similarities between the FUNC and DU group demonstrate that it is important to separate DU patients from other "organic" patients in such investigations.
机译:目的:评估功能性腹痛(FUNC)患者与十二个十二指肠溃疡(DU)患者,胆结石或尿路结石(STONE)患者和健康非患者对照(HEALTH)这三个独立对照组之间的心理差异。方法:所有参与者均完成了一份自我管理的调查问卷,其中包括有关症状与某些生活事件之间的关系以及对心理困扰(SCL-90)和脆弱性的心理测验的问题。参与者:FUNC组由27例长期腹痛且无明显异常的医院门诊患者组成(10例男性和17例女性;平均年龄38岁)。 DU组由13例未经内镜检查证实的十二指肠溃疡门诊患者组成(9名男性和4名女性;平均年龄42岁),而STONE组包括13例未经治疗的胆结石(n = 7)或尿路结石(n = 6)(六例)男性和七名女性;平均年龄43岁)。健康组由五名男性和九名女性组成(平均年龄36岁)。结果:与STONE患者相比,FUNC和DU患者明显多于14种生活事件中的一种(分别为74%,77%和31%; p = 0.02)。与STONE和HEALTH组相比,FUNC和DU组在SCL-90抑郁量表上的得分明显高于健康组(p <0.05),而在焦虑量表上的得分高于STONE和HEALTH组(p <0.05)。与所有其他组相比,FUNC组在躯体化子量表上的得分明显更高(p <0.05)。作为心理困扰的整体衡量指标,计算了全球严重程度指数(GSI)。与健康组相比,FUNC组的GSI显着更高(p <0.01),而DU组的GSI则更高(p = 0.06)。 FUNC和DU组的脆弱性评分显着高于STONE和HEALTH组(p <0.05)。结论:FUNC以及DU的门诊患者似乎比健康对照者或因胆囊或尿路结石引起的疼痛的门诊患者更容易受到心理困扰和伤害。与STONE组相反,FUNC和DU患者中有很大一部分经历过腹痛的发作或加重与某些生活事件有关。 FUNC和DU组之间的相似性表明,在此类研究中将DU患者与其他“有机”患者区分开很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号