首页> 外文期刊>Current issues in tourism >Academics as policy-makers: (not) researching tourism and events policy formation from the inside
【24h】

Academics as policy-makers: (not) researching tourism and events policy formation from the inside

机译:作为决策者的学者:(不)从内部研究旅游业和大型活动的政策形成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prompted by a period of five years as a non-executive director of a British regional tourist board, this paper examines the constraints faced by academics seeking to engage in critical policy research. It identifies three overlapping influences that serve to circumscribe critical comment. The first is that as universities become increasingly commercial in their orientation, often competing with consultants, a culture of collaboration can develop which encourages shared practices and perspectives. The need for teamwork, shared vision and 'not letting the side down' serves to limit or suppress some observations. The second is that universities often have a perceived common interest with city or regional policy-makers in promoting positive images of their locale. As a consequence, senior university managers can become part of informal coalitions of interest who may not welcome narratives that undermine prevailing official discourses. Academics, as workers, may feel inhibited from offering alternative perspectives. Finally, funded research requires the acceptance of certain frames of reference which are set, or accepted, by those commissioning the work. This inevitably limits the conceptual and methodological choices open to academics. The paper concludes by calling for a wider debate about the role of academics and their articulation with the policy-making community.
机译:在担任英国区域旅游局的非执行董事的五年内,本文提出了对寻求进行重要政策研究的学者所面临的制约因素的研究。它确定了三个相互重叠的影响,用于限制批判性评论。首先是,随着大学在其定位方面变得越来越商业化,并经常与顾问竞争,可以形成一种鼓励共同做法和观点的协作文化。团队合作,共同的愿景以及“不容置疑”的需求限制或压制了一些观察。第二个问题是,在提升本地形象方面,大学通常与城市或地区决策者具有共同的兴趣。结果,大学高级管理人员可能会成为非正式利益联盟的一部分,他们可能不欢迎破坏主流官方话语的叙述。作为工作者的学者们可能会感到束缚,无法提供其他观点。最后,获得资助的研究需要接受由那些从事这项工作的人设定或接受的某些参考框架。这不可避免地限制了向学者开放的概念和方法选择。最后,本文呼吁就学者的作用及其与政策制定者之间的衔接进行更广泛的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号