...
首页> 外文期刊>Current issues in language planning >Examining the English language policy for ethnic minority students in a Chinese university: a language ideology and language regime perspective
【24h】

Examining the English language policy for ethnic minority students in a Chinese university: a language ideology and language regime perspective

机译:研究中国大学少数民族学生的英语政策:一种语言意识形态和语言制度视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We focus on the learning of English in a Chinese university in Jiangsu and the university's preferential language policy, which allowed Uyghur minority students from Xinjiang to be enrolled despite their lower scores in the entrance examination. Guided by the constructs of language ideologies [Kroskrity, P. V. (2000). Regimes of language: Ideologies, politics, identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press] and language regimes [Sonntag, S. K., & Cardinal, L. (2015). Introduction. In L. Cardinal & S. K. Sonntag (Eds.), State traditions and language regimes (pp. 3-26). Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press], we adopted an ethnographic approach [McCarty, T. L. (2015). Ethnography in language planning and policy research. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 81-93). Maiden, MA: Wiley Blackwell] to investigate how Uyghur students viewed their English learning and how the university responded to macro-level national language planning decisions to foster social harmony. Our findings revealed that the minority students were marginalized in their study of English and disadvantaged compared to Han students. Consequently, we argue for a consideration of the impart of power inequalities in relation to English language learning. Such a critical perspective entails (1) acknowledging the disadvantaged position from which these minority students began their formal education because English was a third language for them [Yang, J. (2005). English as a third language among China's ethnic minorities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(6), 552-567] and (2) recognizing that access to English education is not equitable because students who attend schools in economically developed provinces such as Jiangsu are more likely to get a better education in English than those from a less developed province such as Xinjiang.
机译:我们专注于在江苏的中国大学学习英语以及该大学的优惠语言政策,该政策使来自新疆的维吾尔族少数民族学生入学考试尽管成绩较低。受语言意识形态建构的指导[Kroskrity,P. V.(2000)。语言制度:意识形态,政治,身份。新墨西哥州圣达菲:美国研究出版社学院]和语言制度[Sonntag,S. K.,&Cardinal,L.(2015)。介绍。在L.Cardinal和S.K. Sonntag(编辑)中,阐述了国家传统和语言制度(第3-26页)。蒙特利尔:麦吉尔·奎因大学出版社],我们采用了人种学方法[McCarty,T. L.(2015)。人种学在语言规划和政策研究中。在F. M. Hult和D. C. Johnson(编辑)中,语言政策和计划的研究方法:实用指南(pp。81-93)。马萨诸塞州的梅登(Maiden):研究维吾尔族学生如何看待他们的英语学习,以及大学如何回应宏观国家语言规划的决策,以促进社会和谐。我们的研究结果表明,少数民族学生的英语学习处于边缘地位,与汉族学生相比处于劣势。因此,我们主张考虑与英语学习有关的权力不平等。这种批判的观点需要(1)认识到这些少数民族学生开始接受正规教育的不利地位,因为英语是他们的第三语言[Yang,J.(2005)。英语是中国少数民族中的第三语言。 《国际双语教育和双语论杂志》,8(6),552-567]和(2)认识到英语教育的获得是不公平的,因为在经济发达的省份(如江苏)上学的学生更有可能获得更好的教育与来自新疆等欠发达省份的英语相比,英语水平更高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Current issues in language planning》 |2016年第4期|311-331|共21页
  • 作者单位

    English Department, School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China,Department of English, School of Foreign Languages & Literature, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China;

    Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic, Asian and African Languages, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA;

    Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic, Asian and African Languages, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Language ideology; language regime; Uyghur; ethnography; linguistic rights;

    机译:语言意识形态;语言制度;维吾尔族人种志;语言权利;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号