首页> 外文期刊>Critical Discourse Studies >The politics of need interpretation: discourse and the needs of disabled survivors of abuse
【24h】

The politics of need interpretation: discourse and the needs of disabled survivors of abuse

机译:需求解释的政治:话语和残障幸存者的需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The abuse of disabled women is an issue that has not historically been given a great deal of attention. More recently, efforts to raise awareness of this particular set of needs have been ongoing but largely limited to the specialised spheres of domestic violence and disability activism. This paper explores the types of discourse being put forward in these efforts, using Fraser's categorisation of needs talk within the process of politicisation. It finds evidence of oppositional, expert and reprivatisation discourses and suggests that these have emerged in a way that reflects the distinctive histories of disabled people as well as feminist explanations of domestic violence and abuse.View full textDownload full textKeywordssocial need, domestic violence, caregiver abuse, disabled people's movement, feminism, activismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.491220
机译:虐待残疾妇女是一个历史上从未得到过高度重视的问题。最近,人们一直在努力提高对这组特殊需求的认识,但在很大程度上仅限于家庭暴力和残疾人活动的专门领域。本文使用弗雷泽(Fraser)在政治化过程中对需求谈话的分类,探讨了在这些努力中提出的话语类型。它发现了反对派,专家和私有化言论的证据,并表明这些言论以反映残疾人独特历史以及对家庭暴力和虐待的女权主义解释的方式出现。查看全文下载全文关键字社会需求,家庭暴力,照顾者虐待,残疾人的运动,女权主义和行动主义。相关的变量add add_id ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.491220

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号