首页> 外文期刊>Critical Criminology >Vandalizing Meaning, Stealing Memory: Artistic, Cultural, and Theoretical Implications of Crime in Galleries and Museums
【24h】

Vandalizing Meaning, Stealing Memory: Artistic, Cultural, and Theoretical Implications of Crime in Galleries and Museums

机译:破坏意义,窃取记忆:画廊和博物馆中犯罪的艺术,文化和理论含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper discusses two different types of crime that occur in art museums: the theft of art objects and the vandalism of works of art. This paper explores the extent to which theft may affect our memory of a given work of art (regardless of whether the object is ultimately recovered), as well as our experience of the museum (especially if efforts are subsequently undertaken to improve security, such as with the Munch Museum following the theft of the Scream). With respect to vandalism, this paper considers whether and how such acts subsequently affect the value we place on the assaulted items as cultural icons and the meaning of the paintings as art objects. This paper argues that how we regard such events should be determined not by their criminality, but by the individual’s or individuals’ intent and the effect of the acts on the meaning and memory of the works.
机译:本文讨论了在艺术博物馆中发生的两种不同类型的犯罪:盗窃艺术品和破坏艺术品的行为。本文探讨了盗窃可能在多大程度上影响我们对既定艺术品的记忆(无论最终是否回收该物品),以及我们在博物馆的经历(尤其是如果随后进行了一些努力来提高安全性,例如尖叫声被盗后与蒙克博物馆一起去)。关于故意破坏,本文考虑了这种行为是否以及随后如何影响我们对作为文化偶像的被攻击物品以及作为艺术品的绘画含义的价值。本文认为,我们如何看待此类事件不应取决于其犯罪性,而应取决于个人的意图或行为对作品的含义和记忆的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical Criminology》 |2011年第1期|p.15-28|共14页
  • 作者

    Avi Brisman;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Anthropology, Emory University, 207 Anthropology Building, 1557 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号