首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Online platforms and pricing: Adapting abuse of dominance assessments to the economic reality of free products
【24h】

Online platforms and pricing: Adapting abuse of dominance assessments to the economic reality of free products

机译:在线平台和定价:适应滥用统治性评估对自由产品的经济现实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Online platforms, which are at the forefront of today's economy, are subject to intensive competition law enforcement. However, the platform business model presents challenges for the application of competition law. Most notably, they appear to offer consumers a great number of their products for free. The explanation for most of these supposedly free products is offered by two-sided market theory: consumers may not be paying, but the 'other' side of the market is. This other side of the market often consists of advertisers, which pay the platform for access to the consumers' information (to target advertisements) and attention (to show the advertisements). As many of these platforms are now potentially dominant, they come within the scope of competition law's abuse of dominance provision, including the doctrines of predatory and excessive pricing. These price-based theories need to adapt to the often price-less platform business model in order to prevent competition authorities from making both type I and type II enforcement errors. At the same time, competition law enforcement needs to consider-and at times give priority to-other branches of law that address abusive behaviour concerning free products. Through the use of case studies, this article therefore suggests ways in which abuse of dominance assessments can take into account the economic reality of free products. (C) 2019 Friso Bostoen. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在当今经济的最前沿,在线平台,受到强化竞争执法的影响。然而,平台商业模式为竞争法的应用提出了挑战。最值得注意的是,他们似乎为消费者提供了大量的产品。双面市场理论提供了对大多数这些自由产品的解释:消费者可能不付钱,但市场的“其他”方面是。市场的另一面通常由广告商组成,该广告商支付了访问消费者信息的平台(以目标广告)和注意力(以显示广告)。由于这些平台的许多平台现在可能是占主导地位的,他们落入竞争法滥用统治性规定的范围,包括掠夺性和过度定价的教义。这些基于价格的理论需要适应经常价格的平台商业模式,以防止竞争权限既是I型和II型执法错误。与此同时,竞争执法需要考虑 - 有时会优先考虑与其他关于免费产品的滥用行为的其他法律分支。因此,通过案例研究,本文旨在提出滥用统治性评估的方式,可以考虑到自由产品的经济现实。 (c)2019 Friso Bostoen。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号