首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Online platforms and pricing: Adapting abuse of dominance assessments to the economic reality of free products
【24h】

Online platforms and pricing: Adapting abuse of dominance assessments to the economic reality of free products

机译:在线平台和定价:使滥用主导地位评估适应免费产品的经济现实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Online platforms, which are at the forefront of today's economy, are subject to intensive competition law enforcement. However, the platform business model presents challenges for the application of competition law. Most notably, they appear to offer consumers a great number of their products for free. The explanation for most of these supposedly free products is offered by two-sided market theory: consumers may not be paying, but the 'other' side of the market is. This other side of the market often consists of advertisers, which pay the platform for access to the consumers' information (to target advertisements) and attention (to show the advertisements). As many of these platforms are now potentially dominant, they come within the scope of competition law's abuse of dominance provision, including the doctrines of predatory and excessive pricing. These price-based theories need to adapt to the often price-less platform business model in order to prevent competition authorities from making both type I and type II enforcement errors. At the same time, competition law enforcement needs to consider-and at times give priority to-other branches of law that address abusive behaviour concerning free products. Through the use of case studies, this article therefore suggests ways in which abuse of dominance assessments can take into account the economic reality of free products. (C) 2019 Friso Bostoen. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在线平台处于当今经济的最前沿,需要严格执行竞争法。但是,平台业务模型为竞争法的应用提出了挑战。最值得注意的是,它们似乎为消费者免费提供了大量他们的产品。双向市场理论提供了对大多数这些所谓的免费产品的解释:消费者可能不付款,而市场的“另一端”却是。市场的另一面通常由广告商组成,这些广告商为访问消费者的信息(定位广告)和注意力(显示广告)付费。由于这些平台中的许多平台现在具有潜在的主导地位,因此它们属于竞争法滥用主导条款的范围,包括掠夺性定价和过度定价原则。这些基于价格的理论需要适应通常无价的平台业务模型,以防止竞争管理机构犯I型和II型执行错误。同时,竞争执法部门需要考虑,有时还要优先处理涉及自由产品滥用行为的其他法律部门。因此,通过使用案例研究,本文提出了滥用主导地位评估的方法可以考虑到免费产品的经济现实的问题。 (C)2019弗里索·博斯托恩。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号