首页> 外文期刊>Communication research >The Effects of Interaction Goals on Negotiation Tactics and Outcomes: A Dyad-Level Analysis Across Two Cultures
【24h】

The Effects of Interaction Goals on Negotiation Tactics and Outcomes: A Dyad-Level Analysis Across Two Cultures

机译:互动目标对谈判策略和结果的影响:两种文化的双重分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates how negotiators' interaction goals influence their own and their counterparts' negotiation tactics and outcomes across two cultures using a simulated employment contract negotiation. Results show that when negotiators placed greater importance on competitive goals,they used more distributive persuasion and fewer priority information exchange tactics, which reduced their counterparts' profit;negotiators' competitive goals also caused their counterparts to use fewer priority information exchange tactics, which in turn hurt their own profit. Dyad members' competitive goals have an indirect, negative impact on joint profit. In addition, Chinese negotiators placed greater importance on competitive goals and used more distributive and fewer integrative tactics than Americans, but the associations between goals and tactics did not differ across cultures. Nevertheless, members of the two cultures took different paths to improve joint profit;as a result, Chinese dyads achieved no less joint profit than American dyads.The study sheds light on culture's effect on the interactive processes by which goals impact negotiation performance.
机译:这项研究使用模拟的雇佣合同谈判调查了谈判者的互动目标如何在两种文化中影响他们自己和对方的谈判策略和结果。结果表明,当谈判者更加重视竞争目标时,他们会使用更多的分布式劝说和较少的优先信息交换策略,从而降低了同行的利润;谈判者的竞争目标也导致其同行使用了较少的优先信息交换策略,从而反过来损害了自己的利益。 Dyad成员的竞争目标对共同利润产生间接的负面影响。另外,与美国人相比,中国谈判者更加重视竞争目标,并采用了更多的分配策略和更少的整合策略,但是目标和策略之间的联系在不同文化之间没有差异。然而,两种文化的成员采取不同的途径来提高共同利润;因此,中国二分体获得的共同利润不比美国二分之一少。该研究揭示了文化对目标影响谈判绩效的互动过程的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号