...
首页> 外文期刊>Building research & information >Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost-benefit evaluation
【24h】

Economic feasibility of green office building: combining life cycle cost analysis and cost-benefit evaluation

机译:绿办公楼的经济可行性:结合生命周期成本分析和成本效益评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Construction practitioners have adopted the green building (GB) concept to restore environmental damage caused by the built environment over the last decade. However, there is inconclusive debate regarding GB savings' potential to recover the cost of construction, maintenance, and renewals. This paper evaluates the feasibility of green-certified office buildings in Indonesia by comparing the life cycle cost and presents the cost-benefit ratio. Data were obtained from primary data and combined with reliable secondary sources for analysis. The result shows that GB requires an additional cost of 9.22% but offers energy and water savings over the building's life cycle accounted for 58.65%. Research has shown that GB adoption reduces the cost per square metre by 41.74% over the traditional one. The cost-benefit ratio of energy, water, and carbon emissions was 2.35 and thus, justified the increased costs of investment, maintenance, and renewals of GB. This research's findings can assist policymakers, practitioners, developers, and other interested parties in the construction sector in bringing forward regulatory changes, collaboration initiatives, capital investment, or other decision-making support.
机译:建筑从业者采用了绿色建筑(GB)概念,以恢复过去十年内建筑环境造成的环境损害。但是,有关GB储蓄潜力的不确定辩论,以恢复建筑,维护和续订成本。本文通过比较生命周期成本并呈现成本效益比来评估印度尼西亚绿色认证办公楼的可行性。从主要数据获得数据并结合可靠的二级来源进行分析。结果表明,GB需要额外的成本为9.22%,但在建筑的生命周期中提供能量和水资源占58.65%。研究表明,GB采用将每平方米的成本降低41.74%。能源,水和碳排放的成本效益比例为2.35,因此为GB的投资,维护和续订成本增加了。该研究的调查结果可以帮助政策制定者,从业者,开发商和建筑业的其他有关方面,以促进监管改变,协作举措,资本投资或其他决策支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号