【24h】

It's Baack?!

机译:是巴克吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We would have bet cash money that we had heard the last of the periodic Fairness Doctrine alarms when the FCC finally took it off the books officially in 2011, thanks in part to the dogged determination of then-commissioner Robert McDowell. The doctrine required broadcasters to actively seek out and offer airtime to the other side of a controversial issue if they gave airtime to one side. It had not been enforced since 1987, but was still on the books. Republicans long feared it would be invoked by Democrats looking to crack down on conservative talkers, especially since Democrats had periodically invoked it in an effort to do just that. Now the cry has gone up again, from House Communications Subcommittee members who don't like the sound of the FCC's planned study of "critical information needs" of communities.
机译:我们可以赌现金,当FCC最终在2011年正式将其从账簿中删除时,我们已经听到了最后一次定期的《公平主义》警报,部分原因是当时的专员罗伯特·麦克道尔(Robert McDowell)顽强的决心。该学说要求广播公司积极寻找并向有争议的问题的另一侧提供广播时间,如果他们将广播时间提供给另一侧。自1987年以来就没有强制执行过,但仍在记录中。共和党人长期以来一直担心试图压制保守的谈话者的民主党人会援引它,特别是因为民主党为此目的而定期地援引它。现在,众议院通讯小组委员会的成员再次大喊大叫,他们不喜欢FCC计划中的有关社区“关键信息需求”研究的声音。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Broadcasting & Cable》 |2013年第46期|24-24|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号