首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Comparison of uptake of breast screening, cervical screening, and childhood immunisation
【24h】

Comparison of uptake of breast screening, cervical screening, and childhood immunisation

机译:比较乳房筛查,宫颈筛查和儿童免疫接种的摄取

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The national breast screening programme invites women aged 50-64 to have mammography every three years, by using the lists of the family health services authorities and health boards to provide a call and recall system. Breast screening centres ask general practitioners to check previous notification lists, encourage attendance, provide practical advice, allay fears, and, with non-attenders, discuss breast screening. Despite the additional workload that promoting a high uptake entails no financial incentive is paid to general practitioners. Cervical screening and childhood immunisation are largely managed and delivered by general practitioners and primary care teams, although some practices also use a central call and recall system. General practitioners receive target payments (payments for reaching certain levels of uptake) for cervical screening and childhood immunisation. Different methods of management and remuneration may influence levels of uptake of breast screening, cervical screening, and childhood immunisation, by influencing general practitioners' attitudes and sense of participation in these services. We compared the rates of uptake for the three services among general practitioners in Grampian, Scotland.
机译:全国乳腺检查计划邀请50-64岁的女性每三年进行一次乳房X线摄影检查,方法是使用家庭健康服务机构和健康委员会的清单提供呼叫和召回系统。乳房筛查中心要求全科医生检查以前的通知清单,鼓励出勤,提供实用建议,减轻恐惧,并与非监护人讨论乳房筛查。尽管增加了工作量,但促进高摄取量并不会给全科医生带来经济上的刺激。宫颈筛查和儿童免疫很大程度上由全科医生和初级保健团队管理和提供,尽管有些做法也使用中央呼叫和召回系统。全科医生接受子宫颈筛查和儿童免疫接种的目标付款(达到一定摄取水平的付款)。通过影响全科医生的态度和参与这些服务的意识,不同的管理和薪酬方法可能会影响对乳腺癌筛查,子宫颈筛查和儿童免疫接种的接受程度。我们比较了苏格兰格兰屏的全科医生的三种服务的摄取率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号