...
首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >ASTHMA AND PESTICIDES IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: DOES THE ADA PROVIDE A REMEDY WHERE FIFRA FAILS TO PROTECT?
【24h】

ASTHMA AND PESTICIDES IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: DOES THE ADA PROVIDE A REMEDY WHERE FIFRA FAILS TO PROTECT?

机译:公立学校中的哮喘和病虫害:ADA是否提供对未成年人保护的补救措施?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For students suffering from asthma exacerbated or induced by chemical pesticide use, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) may provide a remedy to enjoin the use of chemical pesticides in public schools. The ADA has been used as a remedy for environmentally-related disabilities with mixed results. There have been successful challenges to the ADA used in this context based on the comprehensive regulatory nature of many environmental statutes. This Note will argue that a student who suffers from pesticide-induced asthma is protected by the ADA. Further, the challenges that have precluded relief under other environmental statutes would fail in this context because the scope of regulation of pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) is not wide enough to provide a private right of action. Because of this, the ADA provides a remedy that is not in conflict with FIFRA.
机译:对于因使用化学农药而加剧或诱发的哮喘的学生,《美国残障人士法案》(ADA)可能提供一种补救措施,禁止在公立学校使用化学农药。 ADA已被用作与环境相关的残疾的补救措施,但效果不一。基于许多环境法规的全面监管性质,在此背景下使用的ADA面临着成功的挑战。本说明将论证说,患有农药引起的哮喘的学生受到ADA的保护。此外,在这种情况下,无法根据其他环境法规进行救济的挑战将失败,因为《联邦杀虫,杀菌和灭鼠法》(FIFRA)对农药的管制范围不够广泛,无法提供私人诉权。因此,ADA提供了与FIFRA不冲突的补救措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号