...
首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >ANew (Old) Solution for Online Copyright Enforcement After Thomas and Tenenbaum
【24h】

ANew (Old) Solution for Online Copyright Enforcement After Thomas and Tenenbaum

机译:Thomas和Tenenbaum之后的新的(旧)在线版权实施解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Six years ago, Professors Mark A. Lemley and R. Anthony Reese proposed a dispute resolution process as an alternative to lawsuits against facilitators of peer-to-peer file sharing in an effort to combat online infringement without harming innovation. At the same time, technological developments were making lawsuits against facilitators impracticable. In the years that followed, RIAA attorneys and their opponents fought to establish a framework for enforcing copyrighted works against individual online infringers within existing doctrines of copyright law. Unfortunately, while such enforcement is possible, it has proven to be so problematic as to be unsustainable on a large scale. The process costs an obscene amount of money, fails to deter infringement, and appears to the public to force defendants into settling or accepting unfairly high damage awards.
机译:六年前,Mark A. Lemley和R. Anthony Reese教授提出了争端解决程序,以替代针对点对点文件共享促进者的诉讼,以在不损害创新的情况下打击在线侵权。同时,技术的发展使针对协调人的诉讼变得不切实际。在随后的几年中,RIAA的律师及其反对者们努力建立一个框架,以在现有的版权法原则范围内,针对单个在线侵权者实施版权作品。不幸的是,尽管这样的执行是可能的,但是事实证明它是有问题的,以致于在大规模上是不可持续的。该过程花费了淫秽的金钱,未能阻止侵权,并且在公众面前似乎迫使被告解决或接受不公正的高额赔偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号