首页> 外文期刊>Australian Psychologist >Assessing cognitive impairment in Indigenous Australians: Re-evaluation of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment in Western Australia and the Northern Territory
【24h】

Assessing cognitive impairment in Indigenous Australians: Re-evaluation of the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment in Western Australia and the Northern Territory

机译:评估澳大利亚原住民的认知障碍:西澳大利亚州和北领地金伯利原住民认知评估的重新评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (KICA) was initially developed and validated as a culturally appropriate dementia screening tool for older Indigenous people living in the Kimberley. This paper describes the re-evaluation of the psychometric properties of the cognitive section (KICA-Cog) of this tool in two different populations, including a Northern Territory sample, and a larger population-based cohort from the Kimberley. In both populations, participants were evaluated on the KICA-Cog tool, and independently assessed by expert clinical raters blinded to the KICA scores, to determine validity and reliability of dementia diagnosis for both groups. Community consultation, feedback and education were integral parts of the research. For the Northern Territory sample, 52 participants were selected primarily through health services. Sensitivity was 82.4% and specificity was 87.5% for diagnosis of dementia, with area under the curve (AUC) of .95, based on a cut-off score of 31/32 of a possible 39. For the Kimberley sample, 363 participants from multiple communities formed part of a prevalence study of dementia. Sensitivity was 93.3% and specificity was 98.4% for a cut-off score of 33/34, with AUC = .98 (95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99). There was no education bias found. The KICA-Cog appears to be most reliable at a cut-off of 33/39.
机译:金伯利原住民认知评估(KICA)最初是作为居住在金伯利的老年人的文化适应性痴呆筛查工具而开发和验证的。本文介绍了在两个不同的人群中对该工具认知部分(KICA-Cog)的心理计量学特性的重新评估,包括北领地样本和金伯利地区更大的基于人群的队列。在这两个人群中,参与者均通过KICA-Cog工具进行了评估,并由不了解KICA评分的专业临床评估者进行了独立评估,以确定两组痴呆症诊断的有效性和可靠性。社区咨询,反馈和教育是研究的组成部分。对于北领地样本,主要通过卫生服务选择了52名参与者。根据可能的39分的31/32的最低分,曲折面积(AUC)为0.95,诊断痴呆症的敏感性为82.4%,特异性为87.5%。对于金伯利样本,来自363位参与者多个社区组成了痴呆症患病率研究的一部分。截断评分为33/34,AUC = 0.98(95%置信区间:0.97-0.99),敏感性为93.3%,特异性为98.4%。没有发现教育偏见。 KICA-Cog似乎最可靠,截止值为33/39。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号