首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of International Affairs >The resilience of democratic institutions in Britain, Australia and the United States under conditions of total war
【24h】

The resilience of democratic institutions in Britain, Australia and the United States under conditions of total war

机译:全面战争条件下英国,澳大利亚和美国民主机构的复原力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To what extent are democratic institutions resilient when nation states mobilise for war? Normative and empirical political theorists have long argued that wars strengthen the executive and threaten constitutional politics. In modern democracies, national assemblies are supposed to hold the executive to account by demanding explanations for events and policies; and by scrutinising, reviewing and, if necessary, revising legislative proposals intended to be binding on the host society or policies that have been implemented already. This article examines the extent to which the British and Australian parliaments and the United States Congress held their wartime executives to account during World War II. The research finds that under conditions approaching those of total war, these democratic institutions not only continued to exist, but also proved to be resilient in representing public concerns and holding their executives to account, however imperfectly and notwithstanding delegating huge powers. In consequence, executives—more so British and Australian ministers than President Roosevelt—were required to be placatory as institutional and political tensions within national assemblies and between assemblies and executives continued, and assemblies often asserted themselves. In short, even under the most onerous wartime conditions, democratic politics mattered and democratic institutions were resilient. View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy, institutions, resilience, warRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2012.671291
机译:当民族国家发动战争时,民主制度在多大程度上具有韧性?规范和经验主义的政治理论家长期以来一直认为,战争加强了行政部门并威胁了宪法政治。在现代民主国家,国民议会应该通过要求对事件和政策进行解释来要求行政机关负责。通过审查,审查并在必要时修订旨在对东道国社会或已经实施的政策具有约束力的立法提案。本文探讨了第二次世界大战期间英,澳两国议会和美国国会对战时高管的追究程度。研究发现,在接近全面战争的条件下,这些民主制度不仅继续存在,而且在代表公众关注和要求其高管负责任的过程中表现出一定的弹性,尽管这是不完美的,而且尽管委派了大国。结果是,随着国民议会内部以及议会与行政人员之间的体制和政治紧张局势持续存在,而高管们通常会自言自语,因此,高管们比英国罗斯福总统要强得多,而不是罗斯福总统。简而言之,即使在最艰苦的战时条件下,民主政治也很重要,民主机构具有韧性。查看全文下载全文关键字民主,机构,弹性,战争相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”, pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2012.671291

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号