【24h】

Formative assessment: a critical review

机译:形成性评估:严格审查

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper covers six interrelated issues in formative assessment (aka, ‘assessment for learning’). The issues concern the definition of formative assessment, the claims commonly made for its effectiveness, the limited attention given to domain considerations in its conceptualisation, the under‐representation of measurement principles in that conceptualisation, the teacher‐support demands formative assessment entails, and the impact of the larger educational system. The paper concludes that the term, ‘formative assessment’, does not yet represent a well‐defined set of artefacts or practices. Although research suggests that the general practices associated with formative assessment can facilitate learning, existing definitions admit such a wide variety of implementations that effects should be expected to vary widely from one implementation and student population to the next. In addition, the magnitude of commonly made quantitative claims for effectiveness is suspect, deriving from untraceable, flawed, dated, or unpublished sources. To realise maximum benefit from formative assessment, new development should focus on conceptualising well‐specified approaches built around process and methodology rooted within specific content domains. Those conceptualisations should incorporate fundamental measurement principles that encourage teachers and students to recognise the inferential nature of assessment. The conceptualisations should also allow for the substantial time and professional support needed if the vast majority of teachers are to become proficient users of formative assessment. Finally, for greatest benefit, formative approaches should be conceptualised as part of a comprehensive system in which all components work together to facilitate learning.View full textDownload full textKeywordsformative assessment, assessment for learningRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
机译:本文涵盖了形成性评估(又名“学习评估”)中的六个相互关联的问题。这些问题涉及形成性评估的定义,对其有效性的普遍要求,在概念化中对领域考虑的有限关注,概念化中度量原则的不足表示,老师的支持要求形成性评估,以及更大的教育体系的影响。本文得出的结论是,“正式评估”一词尚不能代表一套定义明确的人工制品或做法。尽管研究表明,与形成性评估相关的一般做法可以促进学习,但是现有的定义承认实施的种类繁多,因此预期效果会因一种实施和学生人数而异。此外,通常对有效性的量化要求的数量令人怀疑,其来源是无法追踪,有缺陷,过时或未公开的来源。为了从形成性评估中获得最大的收益,新的开发应该集中在概念化的特定方法上,这些方法围绕植根于特定内容领域的过程和方法而构建。这些概念应纳入基本的度量原则,以鼓励教师和学生认识评估的推论性质。如果绝大多数教师要成为形成性评估的熟练用户,则概念化还应提供所需的大量时间和专业支持。最后,为了获得最大的收益,应将形成性方法概念化为一个综合系统的一部分,在该系统中,所有组件共同协作以促进学习。查看全文下载全文关键字形式化评估,学习评估services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号